AI Is Redefining Tech Infrastructure Priorities: The Race to Balance Cost and Carbon in Data Centers

Harrison BrooksWednesday, Apr 16, 2025 12:24 am ET
60min read

The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) has ignited a silent revolution in the heart of the tech industry: data infrastructure. As AI models demand exponential growth in data storage and processing power, companies face a critical dilemma—how to scale infrastructure affordably while curbing soaring carbon emissions. A new report from Seagate, Decarbonizing Data, reveals that the global data center sector is at a crossroads, with 94.5% of professionals reporting surging storage needs driven by AI. The study underscores a pressing need to align cost efficiency with sustainability, as organizations grapple with rising energy bills, material scarcity, and environmental regulations.

The AI-Driven Data Tsunami


The report paints a stark picture: global data center power demand could jump 165% by 2030, according to Goldman Sachs. This surge stems directly from AI’s insatiable appetite for data. For instance, training a single large language model can consume as much energy as five average U.S. households in a year. Seagate’s survey found that 97% of respondents attribute their storage growth to AI adoption, with 72% of companies already deploying AI and 61% expecting their cloud-based storage (reliant on hard drives) to double by 2028.

Yet, the environmental toll is already evident. While 95% of data center professionals express concern about their carbon footprint, only 3.3% prioritize sustainability in procurement decisions. This disconnect suggests a market ripe for disruption—investors should pay close attention to companies offering solutions that cut costs and emissions.

The Triple Whammy of Challenges

The report identifies three core barriers to sustainable scaling:
1. Energy Consumption: Over half (53.5%) cite high energy use as their top challenge.
2. Material Demands: 49.5% highlight raw material shortages, particularly for rare earth metals in storage devices.
3. Space Constraints: 45.5% struggle with physical limits of existing facilities.

Even infrastructure and acquisition costs (28.5% and 27%, respectively) loom large. The report also notes a "disconnect in lifecycle management": while 92.2% of respondents acknowledge the value of extending equipment lifespan, only 15.5% factor this into purchasing decisions. This suggests a missed opportunity for circular economy models that reuse or refurbish hardware.

The Path Forward: Innovation, Circularity, and Collaboration

To navigate these challenges, Seagate proposes three strategic pillars:

1. Technological Breakthroughs

Advances like heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR)—a technology Seagate is championing—could triple storage density, reducing embodied carbon by over 70% per terabyte and cutting costs by 25%. Meanwhile, energy-efficient cooling systems, such as immersion cooling, can slash power use by up to 40% compared to traditional air cooling.

2. Lifecycle Extension and Circular Practices

Extending storage equipment lifespans through maintenance and reuse is critical. Real-time environmental monitoring and transparency in supply chains can incentivize longer-term thinking. For example, refurbishing a 10 PB storage array could delay 14 tons of e-waste while saving $150,000 in procurement costs.

3. Industry-Wide Collaboration

Achieving net-zero goals requires collaboration across the ecosystem. Vendors, cloud providers (e.g., AWS, Microsoft), and regulators must align on standards for emissions tracking (Scope 1, 2, and 3) and sustainable sourcing.

Investment Implications

The report highlights opportunities for investors in three areas:
- Storage Innovation: Firms like Seagate and Western Digital (WDC) are betting on HAMR and helium drives to dominate the high-capacity storage market.
- Energy Efficiency: Companies such as Asetek (ASETEKF) and Green Revolution Cooling, pioneers in liquid cooling, are positioned to benefit from a shift away from traditional HVAC systems.
- Circular Economy Plays: Hardware recyclers like Iron Mountain (IRM) and cloud providers investing in refurbished equipment (e.g., Dell Technologies) may gain traction as lifecycle management becomes a priority.

Conclusion: The Triple Bottom Line

The data center sector’s future hinges on its ability to balance cost, carbon, and capacity. Seagate’s analysis reveals a clear path forward through innovation and collaboration, but execution will determine winners and losers. For investors, the stakes are high: companies that prioritize sustainable infrastructure—whether through cutting-edge tech or circular practices—are likely to outperform peers as regulatory pressures mount and consumer demand for ESG-aligned solutions grows.

The numbers speak plainly: reducing embodied carbon by 70% and cutting costs by 25% via HAMR alone underscores the financial and environmental upside of smarter storage. As AI reshapes the digital economy, those who master the dual challenge of cost and carbon will not only survive but thrive. The race is on.