AI's Job Impact Overstated as Human Oversight Remains Key

The risks of widespread job losses due to artificial intelligence are being overstated, according to David Sachs, the White House Cryptocurrency and Artificial Intelligence Adviser. In a recent post on X, Sachs argued that AI functions more as a “middle-man” in business workflows, with humans retaining ultimate control over decisions and management. He emphasized that even the most advanced AI systems require human oversight to deliver tangible business value [1].

Microsoft’s recent research supports this nuanced view of AI’s impact on employment. A study analyzing 200,000 anonymous Bing Copilot interactions identified the jobs most at risk of automation. Journalists, analysts, and technical writers — roles that are also common in the cryptocurrency industry — were found to be among the most susceptible. These positions received high AI applicability scores, with reporting and copywriting rated between 0.38 and 0.39, and market analysts and data scientists slightly lower at 0.35 to 0.36. These figures indicate the likelihood that AI can perform the tasks effectively compared to human workers [1].

The relevance of automation in the cryptocurrency industry is growing. In July 2025, job vacancies in the sector saw a notable decline, a trend that coincided with a U.S. Department of Labor report showing only 73,000 jobs were added nationally, falling short of the 100,000 increase predicted by Dow Jones. This reduction raises questions about the industry’s future labor needs and how AI may be reshaping traditional job markets [1].

Sachs also referenced Balaji Srinivasan, the former CTO of Coinbase, who noted that current AI systems are not truly autonomous. Srinivasan explained that AI is evolving and competing with earlier versions of itself rather than directly displacing human workers. For example, Midjourney has surpassed Stable Diffusion in image generation, and GPT-4 has replaced GPT-3 in large language models. These transitions highlight the competitive nature of AI development rather than a direct threat to human employment [1].

Overall, the discussion around AI and job displacement remains complex. While certain roles face higher automation risks, the technology appears to be augmenting rather than fully replacing human labor. As AI models continue to improve, their integration into the workforce will likely depend on the extent to which they can complement — rather than substitute — human capabilities.

Source:

[1] https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/6890ac6dc655ae7a1f830f23/