Agilent Plummets 0.37 as $250M Volume Ranks 492nd in U.S. Volume

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Wednesday, Sep 17, 2025 6:17 pm ET1min read
A--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Agilent fell 0.37% on Sept. 17 with $250M volume, ranking 492nd in U.S. trading activity.

- Weak life sciences guidance and a strategic shift to higher-margin instruments drove the decline, with analysts noting a 12-18 month timeline for margin improvements from divesting low-margin consumables.

- A partnership with a European biotech firm for AI-driven lab automation and a 4.2% Q2 institutional stake increase signal long-term confidence despite near-term challenges.

Agilent Technologies (A) fell 0.37% on Sept. 17, with a trading volume of $250 million, ranking 492nd among U.S.-listed stocks. The decline followed a mixed earnings report showing weaker-than-expected guidance for its life sciences division and a strategic shift toward higher-margin analytical instruments. Analysts noted the company's decision to divest its lower-margin consumables business could reshape its revenue mix but may take 12-18 months to show measurable impact on margins.

Recent market sentiment reflects cautious optimism as AgilentA-- announced a partnership with a European biotech firm to co-develop AI-driven lab automation systems. The collaboration, while non-accrual in the near term, signals strategic alignment with long-term industry trends. Institutional investors increased their stake in Agilent by 4.2% in the second quarter, according to a regulatory filing, suggesting confidence in the company's pivot toward premium R&D tools despite near-term headwinds.

To run this type of “dynamic-universe” back-test we need to know a few extra details and, importantly, decide how to map your idea to the tools that are currently available (each tool back-tests one ticker at a time). Universe • Do you want all U.S.–listed common stocks (NYSE/Nasdaq/Amex), or a narrower set such as the S&P 500 constituents? Ranking & execution convention • Day-t ranking is based on which price? (close is the usual choice.) • Trade price for entry: today’s close or tomorrow’s open? Weighting & costs • Equal-weight or volume-weighted? • Any transaction cost assumptions? Practical implementation • Our engine can’t yet hold 500 tickers simultaneously. The closest match is an event study: for every stock we flag the dates on which it ranks in the top-500 by volume, then measure the 1-day forward return and average across all events. If that approach is acceptable, I can proceed automatically; otherwise we’d have to limit the scope (e.g., test only a handful of tickers). Please let me know your preferences on the above so I can set up the data pulls and run the back-test for you.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet