Acco Group shares surge 27.09% intraday as stock trends on high turnover and 11.37% pre-market gain.

think> Okay, let's tackle this query step by step. The user wants me to act as a financial analyst explaining Acco Group's stock price movement based on provided news. First, I need to parse the input data. The stock performance is a 27.090301% intraday increase, which rounds to 27.09%. The trading period is intraday. The relevant news event is from Trending Stocks Today, mentioning a 11.37% boost pre-market. The summary says Acco Group's stock got a 11.37% boost to $3.33 with $47.16 million turnover. The content lists it as a pre-market gainer. Now, the key points: The stock's intraday movement is up by 27.09%, but the news event mentions a pre-market gain of 11.37%. The user wants to link the movement to the news. However, the news is about pre-market activity, while the stock's movement is intraday. The question is whether the pre-market gain is the cause of the intraday increase. But the example given in the prompt shows that the news event's timing (pre-market) is linked to the pre-market movement. Here, the stock's movement is during intraday, but the news is about pre-market. Wait, the user's instruction says to evaluate if each news event is relevant. The news event is about a pre-market gain, but the stock's movement is intraday. So, does the pre-market news cause the intraday movement? That might not be directly related. However, the pre-market performance could influence the intraday movement. For example, if the stock opened higher due to pre-market gains, the intraday could continue that trend. But the example in the prompt links the news to the same trading session. In the example, the news is about the pre-market, and the stock's movement is also pre-market. Here, the movement is intraday, but the news is about pre-market. But maybe the user expects that the pre-market news is the reason for the intraday movement. The problem is that the news event is from pre-market, and the stock's movement is during the intraday session. The example shows that when the news is pre-market, the movement is also pre-market. In this case, the movement is intraday, which is a different session. However, the news could have carried over into the intraday session. Alternatively, perhaps the user made a mistake in the input, but I have to work with what's given. The task is to determine if the news events are relevant. The only news event here is the pre-market gain of 11.37%. The stock's intraday movement is 27.09%. The question is whether the pre-market news caused the intraday movement. In financial markets, pre-market gains can influence the regular trading session. So if the stock had a significant pre-market gain, that could lead to continued buying pressure during the intraday session. Therefore, the pre-market news is relevant. The next step is to check if the news is bullish. The pre-market gain is positive, so it's a bullish event. The stock's movement is upward, aligning with the news. Now, the user wants a concise summary in the style of Bloomberg or Reuters. The example uses the structure: [Company] [movement] [percentage] [session] after [event]. In this case, the movement is intraday, and the news is pre-market. The challenge is to connect the pre-market news to the intraday movement. Possible phrasing: "Acco Group surged 27.09% intraday following a significant pre-market gain, as the stock initially jumped 11.37% to $3.33 with a turnover of $47.16 million, reflecting strong investor interest." But need to check if the example allows for linking different sessions. The example links the pre-market news to the pre-market movement. Here, the movement is intraday, but the cause is pre-market. However, in reality, pre-market performance can influence intraday prices. So it's plausible. The key is to state that the intraday movement was driven by the pre-market news. The example's output for the pre-market movement directly references the news. Here, the movement is intraday, so the summary should mention that the intraday surge was fueled by the pre-market gain. Therefore, the correct summary would mention the pre-market gain as the cause of the intraday movement. The percentage in the news is 11.37%, but the actual intraday movement is 27.09%. The user wants the movement's percentage and the cause. So the final answer would be a concise paragraph stating the intraday surge, the pre-market gain as the cause, and.