Aave News Today: AAVE Dips 10% as Aave Founder Blocks DAO Asset Transfer Vote

Generated by AI AgentNyra FeldonReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Thursday, Dec 25, 2025 8:25 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Aave's DAO and

Labs clash over governance control of brand assets and revenue streams, with founder Stani Kulechov opposing DAO's asset transfer proposal.

- Wintermute CEO Evgeny Gaevoy criticizes ARFC proposal's unclear governance structure, fearing profit-driven management of Aave's frontend and brand.

- AAVE token drops 10% amid governance tensions, with $37.8M in whale sell-offs and accusations of strategic holiday voting timing.

- Analysts watch Aave's resolution as a DeFi governance precedent, with $33B TVL at stake and risks to decentralized incentive alignment in crypto ecosystems.

The

DeFi lending protocol is facing a major internal dispute over governance control, as the DAO and Aave Labs continue to clash over the ownership of brand assets and revenue streams. The latest development came when Stani Kulechov, Aave founder and CEO of Aave Labs, to transfer control of key assets such as domains, social media accounts, and naming rights. Kulechov has emphasized the need for a structured process to resolve the matter, . His stance has intensified the debate among Aave's token holders, who argue that the DAO should have full control over the assets it helped build.

Wintermute, a major player in the DeFi space, has also entered the fray. Evgeny Gaevoy, founder and CEO of Wintermute,

, citing concerns over its lack of clarity. Gaevoy highlighted uncertainties around the governance structure of the entity managing Aave's frontend and brand, as well as whether it would operate as a
for-profit entity. The controversy has deepened as the Aave community grapples with the balance between decentralization and the role of centralized development teams like Aave Labs.

Why the Standoff Happened

The governance crisis stems from a disagreement over the allocation of fees and the ownership of Aave's brand. The DAO has

to itself rather than the DAO treasury. Critics argue that this practice undermines token holder incentives and the value-accrual mechanisms that drive the AAVE token's utility. The dispute was further fueled by Aave's integration of CoW Swap, a trade execution tool that resulted in $10 million in annual fees flowing to Aave Labs instead of the DAO. This raised concerns about whether the DAO should maintain control over key brand assets, which are critical to the protocol's market identity and long-term sustainability.

How Markets Reacted

The escalating tensions have had a clear impact on the AAVE token's price. In the past 24 hours, AAVE

, with a total decline of 17% since December 16. On-chain data shows that , signaling growing uncertainty among institutional and whale investors. The timing of the governance vote, which ends on December 26, has also been criticized as a strategic move to limit participation during the holiday period. in the DAO governance process, calling the vote a "preventable worst outcome".

What Analysts Are Watching

The outcome of the vote will have broader implications for how DeFi protocols manage governance and revenue distribution. Analysts are closely watching how Aave resolves this conflict, as it sets a precedent for other projects facing similar tensions between decentralized governance and centralized execution teams. Aave's total value locked (TVL) exceeds $33 billion, making it one of the largest DeFi protocols. The governance issue also reflects a larger challenge in the crypto space:

with decentralized control. If Aave fails to find a compromise, it risks damaging its reputation as a leader in the DeFi ecosystem and could see further sell-offs from major stakeholders.