AAVE Jumps 10% as Founder Proposes Revenue Sharing After Governance Clash

Generated by AI AgentCoinSageReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Saturday, Jan 3, 2026 6:41 am ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

founder Stani Kulechov proposed sharing off-protocol revenue with AAVE holders after a failed governance vote, sparking a 10% token price surge.

- The plan aims to address governance centralization concerns by distributing income from apps, consumer products, and institutional offerings directly to token holders.

- Critics highlight risks from Aave Labs' control over 58% of voting power and the dual onchain-offchain structure, as the proposal seeks to fund expansion into real-world assets and institutional finance.

Aave (AAVE) is navigating a pivotal governance moment after founder Stani Kulechov

from non-protocol businesses with token holders. This follows a rejected December vote that sought to transfer brand assets like domains and social media accounts to decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) control. The rejection sparked concerns about Aave Labs' influence and led to a 14% price drop. Kulechov's new revenue-sharing plan quickly reversed that loss, driving a 10% rally as investors bet on improved alignment.

What Led to Aave's Revenue Sharing Proposal?

Tensions flared when an Aave governance proposal to transfer brand assets to the DAO

. The vote, of participating token holders with 41% abstaining, aimed to decentralize control over websites and social media. Aave Labs retained excessive influence over off-protocol revenue streams like front-end swap fees. That tension triggered a 14% drop in AAVE's price.

Founder Stani Kulechov

a new revenue-sharing model. He from products built atop Aave's core lending protocol directly to token holders. The proposal also for the Aave brand. This structural reset while supporting expansion.

How Will Revenue Sharing Work and What Are the Challenges?

The framework

outside Aave's core lending protocol. This includes fees from the official app, future consumer products, and institutional offerings. A formal vote is to outline distribution mechanics and brand safeguards. Still, .

, with the top three wallets controlling 58% of voting power. raised questions about founder influence despite his stated conviction. The dual structure — onchain DAO governance versus offchain Aave Labs monetization — . Investors are the new model can achieve true alignment.

What Does This Mean for Aave's Future?

Kulechov's vision extends beyond decentralized crypto lending. He

real-world assets (RWAs), institutional credit, and consumer finance. Upcoming protocol upgrades like V4 and the GHO stablecoin are . Revenue sharing could help fund and incentivize these ambitious goals.

However,

as the protocol scales. with efficient product development requires careful design. The outcome of the upcoming DAO vote will token holders back this new direction. Success hinges on resolving the governance-value capture disconnect.