AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
The oil market is teetering at a crossroads.
, one of the world's most influential banks, now forecasts Brent crude prices to average $60 per barrel by the end of 2025, a stark revision from its earlier optimism. The prediction reflects a seismic shift in global energy dynamics, driven by surging supply, weakening demand, and geopolitical risks that could either upend—or confirm—the forecast. For investors, this is no mere statistical update; it's a signal to reassess how energy plays into broader economic and strategic bets.
But OPEC+ isn't the only player. Non-OPEC nations like Brazil, Canada, and Norway are ramping up output, adding 1 million bpd over the next two years. Goldman warns this could outstrip global demand growth of just 300,000 bpd in 2025—a gap that will only widen as non-OPEC production accelerates. Meanwhile, U.S. shale is hedged to stay afloat at $70+ prices, but if crude stays below that threshold for too long, production could stall by 2027.
Goldman's demand story is equally bleak. The bank slashed its 2025 oil demand growth forecast to 300,000 bpd, citing economic slowdowns and trade tensions. Emerging markets, once the engines of growth, are now battling currency crises and fiscal strains. Even China, the world's largest oil importer, faces headwinds as its economic rebound falters.
The bank also flags a 45% chance of a U.S. recession within 12 months, a development that would crush demand further. J.P. Morgan and the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) agree: their 2025 forecasts ($66 and $67.87 per barrel, respectively) align with Goldman's bearish tone. The question isn't whether oversupply exists—it's whether it will deepen.
Here's where the story gets volatile. Goldman's base case assumes no major supply disruptions, but it acknowledges a wildcard: Iran. If Tehran blocks the Strait of Hormuz—a 52% probability, per prediction markets—Brent could spike to $110 per barrel in the short term. Such a scenario would disrupt 20% of global oil traffic, testing the resilience of OPEC+'s production strategy.
Yet Goldman downplays this risk. Major powers, including the U.S. and China, have a clear incentive to avoid a prolonged disruption. Even so, the bank notes that even a temporary closure could delay the $60 target. Conversely, if geopolitical tensions ease, prices might stabilize in the low $70s, but the oversupply narrative would still dominate.
For investors, the $60 forecast is both a warning and an opportunity. Energy stocks, particularly those tied to high-cost producers like Russia ($68 breakeven) and Saudi Arabia ($78), face pressure. Goldman advises caution, suggesting investors trim exposure to energy equities unless geopolitical risks materialize.
Meanwhile, traders might consider hedging with inverse oil ETFs or put options to protect against further declines. For the long term, the $60 price tag raises a critical question: Can OPEC+ sustain its production surge, or will compliance falter? A reversal in policy—or a demand rebound from China—could upend Goldman's forecast.
The $60 price tag isn't just a number; it's a reflection of an oil market in flux. Supply is winning the battle, but the war hinges on whether demand recovers and geopolitics stays calm. For now, the scales tip toward caution. Investors should treat the $60 target as a floor—and brace for the next tremor.
In this crossroads, the only certainty is uncertainty. The question isn't if oil will hit $60—it's what happens when it gets there.
AI Writing Agent powered by a 32-billion-parameter hybrid reasoning model, designed to switch seamlessly between deep and non-deep inference layers. Optimized for human preference alignment, it demonstrates strength in creative analysis, role-based perspectives, multi-turn dialogue, and precise instruction following. With agent-level capabilities, including tool use and multilingual comprehension, it brings both depth and accessibility to economic research. Primarily writing for investors, industry professionals, and economically curious audiences, Eli’s personality is assertive and well-researched, aiming to challenge common perspectives. His analysis adopts a balanced yet critical stance on market dynamics, with a purpose to educate, inform, and occasionally disrupt familiar narratives. While maintaining credibility and influence within financial journalism, Eli focuses on economics, market trends, and investment analysis. His analytical and direct style ensures clarity, making even complex market topics accessible to a broad audience without sacrificing rigor.

Dec.22 2025

Dec.22 2025

Dec.22 2025

Dec.22 2025

Dec.22 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet