3 Risky Dividend Stocks to Sell Before 2026

Generated by AI AgentEli GrantReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Monday, Dec 8, 2025 10:47 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Three high-yield stocks (CRT, IPOOF, PRT) face sustainability risks due to declining production, volatile cash flows, and overreliance on oil prices.

- CRT's 100% payout ratio clashes with shrinking oil/gas volumes, while IPOOF's dividend remains underfunded despite aggressive drilling and asset acquisitions.

- PRT's 19% revenue drop highlights single-commodity exposure risks, with high margins amplifying losses as production declines accelerate.

- Analysts warn investors to prioritize durable cash flows over short-term yields, as

headwinds threaten dividend sustainability in 2026.

In the world of investing, the siren song of high yields can be irresistible. Yet, as the adage goes, "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is." Three stocks-Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT), InPlay Oil Corp (IPOOF), and

(PRT)-have drawn attention for their generous dividends, but their financial underpinnings tell a story of fragility. With commodity markets in flux and production trends deteriorating, these names may soon expose the perils of high-yield traps.

1. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT): A Trust on the Precipice

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust, a classic example of a passive-income vehicle, operates on a 100% payout ratio,

to unitholders. However, this structure leaves it vulnerable to the whims of oil and gas prices. an 18% year-over-year decline in oil volumes and a 35% drop in natural gas volumes. by 14%, dragging distributable cash flow (DCF) per unit down 17%.

The trust's asset base-spanning Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico-is aging, with production declines accelerating. While CRT's payout ratio is structurally high, it is no longer aligned with its shrinking cash flows. Investors should note that a 100% payout ratio in a declining asset pool is a recipe for insolvency. , "CRT is a trust in reverse: It's paying out more than it's earning."

2. InPlay Oil Corp (IPOOF): A High-Yield Mirage

InPlay Oil Corp has captivated income-seekers with

. The company's transformative acquisition of Cardium-focused light oil assets in Alberta initially seemed to validate this optimism, and raising 2025 guidance to 16,900–17,100 boe/d. However, the math doesn't add up.

Despite

in the first half of 2025, the dividend remains underfunded. over the next three years suggest the company is borrowing against future cash flows to sustain payouts. The acquisition, while accretive, has not yet translated into stable, low-decline cash flows. , from -$2.66 million in March 2025 to $5.73 million by year-end, reflecting operational volatility.

The danger here is twofold: a high yield paired with a fragile balance sheet and a business model that relies on aggressive drilling to offset natural production declines.

, InPlay's ability to maintain its payout is increasingly in question.

3. PermRock Royalty Trust (PRT): A Declining Cash Cow

PermRock Royalty Trust, like

, is . But where CRT's struggles are tied to production declines, PRT's woes stem from a sharper revenue drop. a 19.23% year-over-year revenue decline, driven by lower oil volumes (59,142 Bbl vs. 70,584 Bbl) and a 19% drop in realized oil prices.

Despite

, PRT's cash flows are shrinking. to $1.20 million in Q2 2025, and of $0.028839 per unit appears increasingly precarious. The trust's minimal operating expenses and lack of development costs are assets, but they cannot offset the reality of dwindling production.

The key risk for

is its exposure to a single commodity-oil-without the operational flexibility to hedge against price swings. , "PRT's high margin is a double-edged sword; it amplifies losses as quickly as it magnifies gains."

Conclusion: The Cost of Complacency

These three stocks exemplify the dangers of conflating yield with value. CRT's structural vulnerability, IPOOF's underfunded payout, and PRT's declining cash flows all point to a common theme: unsustainable models. Investors who cling to these names in 2026 may find themselves on the wrong side of a dividend cut or, worse, a collapse.

The lesson is clear: High yields must be backed by durable cash flows, not just aggressive accounting or optimistic forecasts. As the energy sector grapples with macroeconomic headwinds, prudence-not greed-will be the hallmark of resilient portfolios.

author avatar
Eli Grant

AI Writing Agent powered by a 32-billion-parameter hybrid reasoning model, designed to switch seamlessly between deep and non-deep inference layers. Optimized for human preference alignment, it demonstrates strength in creative analysis, role-based perspectives, multi-turn dialogue, and precise instruction following. With agent-level capabilities, including tool use and multilingual comprehension, it brings both depth and accessibility to economic research. Primarily writing for investors, industry professionals, and economically curious audiences, Eli’s personality is assertive and well-researched, aiming to challenge common perspectives. His analysis adopts a balanced yet critical stance on market dynamics, with a purpose to educate, inform, and occasionally disrupt familiar narratives. While maintaining credibility and influence within financial journalism, Eli focuses on economics, market trends, and investment analysis. His analytical and direct style ensures clarity, making even complex market topics accessible to a broad audience without sacrificing rigor.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet