Is 2026 a Bear Market Setup for Bitcoin and Crypto? Historical Cycles vs. Midterm Election Narratives

Generated by AI AgentAdrian HoffnerReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Monday, Dec 22, 2025 5:10 am ET3min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Analysts debate 2026

bear market potential, weighing U.S. midterm election trends against 4-year halving cycles.

- Historical data shows midterm years (2014, 2018, 2022) coincided with 59-75% Bitcoin drops, but linked to external shocks, not elections.

- 2024 halving (April) and 2026 midterms create overlapping dynamics, with post-election rallies (2016, 2020) suggesting potential for recovery.

- On-chain metrics signal bearish momentum (RSI 35, NVT undervaluation) but technical indicators hint at trend exhaustion and possible consolidation.

- Analysts split: Fidelity predicts $65k-$70k bear market until late 2026, while Grayscale forecasts $150k+ if institutional demand accelerates.

The debate over whether 2026 will mark a bear market for

and crypto hinges on two competing narratives: the historical bearishness of U.S. midterm election years and the cyclical optimism of Bitcoin's 4-year halving pattern. With the next U.S. midterm elections in November 2026 and the last halving event in April 2024, investors are torn between caution and conviction. This analysis synthesizes historical data, on-chain metrics, and analyst forecasts to determine whether 2026 is a bear market setup-and how to position accordingly.

Historical Midterm Election Years: Correlation or Coincidence?

Bitcoin has historically underperformed during U.S. midterm election years. In 2014, 2018, and 2022, Bitcoin fell by 59%, 75%, and 64%, respectively

. However, these declines were not directly caused by the elections themselves but by external shocks: the collapse of Mt. Gox (2014), the bursting of the ICO bubble (2018), and the FTX implosion (2022) . This suggests that while midterm years may coincide with bearish trends, they are not deterministic.

The 2024 election cycle further complicates the narrative. Though Bitcoin's price dipped 16% two months before the 2020 election, it

. Similarly, the 2016 cycle saw a 30% pre-election drop followed by a 2000% rally . These patterns indicate that midterm years may act as a "reset" period, with post-election clarity driving bullish momentum.

Halving Cycles: A Post-Election Rally Playbook

Bitcoin's 4-year halving events have historically created a "buy the dip" dynamic during election years. For example:
- 2016 Halving: Bitcoin fell 30% pre-election but

.
- 2020 Halving: A 16% pre-election drop was followed by a 320% rally .
- 2024 Halving: Despite a muted post-halving response, Bitcoin remained within historical ranges, with analysts noting .

The 2024 halving occurred just months before the U.S. presidential election, creating a unique overlap. While Bitcoin's price did not immediately spike,

. This suggests that halving cycles may amplify post-election optimism, even if the immediate impact is muted.

On-Chain Metrics: Bearish Signs and Signs of Exhaustion

Late 2025 on-chain data reveals a mixed picture. Bitcoin's RSI hit oversold levels (35),

. The NVT ratio, a valuation metric, also signaled undervaluation, with a "golden cross" dropping into a depressed range . Meanwhile, declining "shark" wallets (holders of 100–1,000 BTC) and negative Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicated distribution and sell-side pressure .

However, technical indicators hint at trend exhaustion. The MACD histogram flattened, and RSI showed hidden bullish divergence as Bitcoin tested key support levels

. These signals suggest that while the bearish trend persists, a short-term bounce or consolidation phase is likely.

Analyst Outlooks: A Split Between Cycles and Capital Flows

The market remains divided on 2026's trajectory:
- Bearish Case: Fidelity's Jurrien Timmer argues the four-year cycle is intact, with a bear market expected to last until late 2026, testing $65,000–$70,000

. Lark Davis and Mr. Wall Street echo this, .
- Bullish Case: Grayscale's 2026 Digital Asset Outlook predicts rising valuations and an end to the four-year cycle, with Bitcoin surpassing its all-time high . On-chain analyst Murphy forecasts a $150,000 target by 2026, contingent on institutional demand .

The split reflects diverging views on macroeconomic factors (e.g., Fed policy, inflation) and regulatory clarity. If the U.S. election resolves policy uncertainty and institutional adoption accelerates, Bitcoin could mirror the S&P 500's post-election outperformance

.

Strategic Implications: Hedge or Position for Resilience?

Given the conflicting signals, investors should adopt a dual strategy:
1. Hedge Against Near-Term Volatility: With on-chain metrics indicating bearish momentum and shark wallets distributing, short-term hedging via options or diversified crypto portfolios is prudent.
2. Position for Post-Election Resilience: If the 2024 halving cycle follows historical patterns,

. Accumulating Bitcoin at oversold levels (e.g., $65,000–$75,000) aligns with long-term bullish scenarios.

The key variable is macroeconomic stability. If the Fed cuts rates and global markets stabilize, Bitcoin's correlation to traditional assets could drive a synchronized rebound. Conversely, a prolonged bear market would require patience and a focus on undervalued on-chain metrics.

Conclusion

2026 is not a guaranteed bear market but a high-probability "reset" year. While midterm election narratives and on-chain bearishness warrant caution, the halving cycle and post-election rally playbook suggest resilience. Investors should hedge short-term risks while positioning for a potential post-November rebound, leveraging historical patterns and evolving macro dynamics.