YUM! Brands Shares Plunge 1.38% on $240M Volume Ranking 462nd in Market Activity

Generado por agente de IAAinvest Volume Radar
martes, 7 de octubre de 2025, 6:23 pm ET1 min de lectura
YUM--

On October 7, 2025, YUM! BrandsYUM-- (YUM) closed down 1.38% with a trading volume of $240 million, ranking 462nd in market activity. The fast-food giant faced pressure amid mixed operational updates and sector-wide volatility.

Recent earnings reports highlighted regional performance disparities, with North American same-store sales growth outpacing international markets. Analysts noted supply chain challenges and inflationary pressures as key headwinds, though the company reaffirmed long-term franchise development targets during investor calls.

Short-term technical indicators show bearish momentum, with the stock testing key support levels below $115. Market participants remain cautious ahead of the Q3 earnings release scheduled for late October. Positioning data suggests reduced short-term speculative interest compared to prior quarters.

To run this back-test rigorously I need to pin down a few practical details that aren’t fully specified in the request. Once these are confirmed I can generate the required trading signals, call the back-test engine and return the performance report. Key items that need your confirmation (defaults I can apply are noted in brackets): 1. Market universe • US-listed common stocks only, excluding ETFs, ADRs, preferreds? (Default: all primary-listed US common stocks that had price ≥ $5.) 2. Ranking rule (the “top-500 by volume”) • Use the previous day’s dollar volume or share volume? (Default: share volume.) • Rank on the regular session’s total volume and rebalance at today’s close? 3. Trade timing & pricing assumption • Entry: buy at today’s close after ranking. • Exit: sell at next day’s close (holding period = 1 trading day). (These will be my defaults unless you prefer open-to-close or close-to-open.) 4. Weighting within the 500-stock basket • Equal-weighted (default) or volume-weighted? 5. Transaction costs / slippage • If nothing is specified I will assume zero explicit costs so you can see the raw strategy edge first. 6. Benchmark • Report excess return vs. S&P 500 Total Return (SPXT) unless you prefer a different benchmark.

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios