Wheat Thins Purchasers Settle with Mondelez Over Labeling Dispute

In a recent development, consumers who purchased Wheat Thins have reached a settlement with Mondelez International, the snack giant behind the popular crackers. The class action lawsuit alleged that Mondelez misled consumers by labeling Wheat Thins as "100% Whole Grain" despite containing refined grains like cornstarch. The settlement, although not admitting guilt, signals Mondelez's willingness to address consumer concerns and maintain its reputation in the competitive snack food industry.

The lawsuit, led by Illinois resident Ivan Blanco and Florida's Kathryn Swiggum, claimed that consumers were misled into believing they were purchasing a product entirely made of whole grains, prompting them to pay a premium price for a misleading promise. Both plaintiffs alleged that they would not have bought the product or would have paid less had they known it wasn't as advertised. The plaintiffs sought damages, fees, costs, and interest for violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, as well as breach of express warranty.

Mondelez, which also owns popular snack brands like Oreo and Ritz, has faced other lawsuits in recent years. In August 2021, a New York lawsuit accused the company of misrepresenting Nabisco Whole Grain Premium Saltine Crackers as being predominantly made with whole grain flour. Additionally, Mondelez has faced scrutiny for its "Cocoa Life" program, which promised sustainable sourcing but was accused of links to unethical labor practices and environmental harm. The company also recently settled a class action lawsuit over a 2023 data breach that exposed sensitive information belonging to thousands of employees.

The settlement in the Wheat Thins labeling case highlights the importance of transparency and honesty in labeling practices for snack food companies. As consumers become more health-conscious and scrutinize product labels, companies must ensure their labeling accurately reflects the product's ingredients and nutritional content. Failure to do so can result in consumer mistrust, damaged brand reputation, and potential legal issues.

Mondelez's willingness to settle the lawsuit, although not admitting guilt, suggests a commitment to addressing consumer concerns and maintaining its reputation in the competitive snack food industry. The settlement may also serve as a reminder to other snack food companies of the importance of accurate labeling and transparency in their marketing strategies.



As the snack food industry continues to evolve, companies must adapt to changing consumer preferences and regulatory requirements. The settlement in the Wheat Thins labeling case serves as a cautionary tale for snack food companies, emphasizing the importance of transparency, honesty, and understanding consumer perceptions in labeling practices. By maintaining accurate and informative labeling, companies can maintain consumer trust and avoid potential legal issues.