Trump Likely to Roll Back, Not Dismantle, Biden's Clean Energy Spending

As the dust settles on the U.S. presidential election, the clean energy sector braces for potential changes under a second Trump administration. While Trump has pledged to dismantle Biden's climate agenda, the reality may be a more nuanced rollback of clean energy spending. Here's a closer look at what's at stake and what to expect.



Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law in August, allocated hundreds of billions of dollars to green the economy. The act provides tax credits for clean energy projects, supports domestic manufacturing, and promotes energy efficiency. These investments have the potential to create jobs, stimulate economic growth, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

However, Trump's victory raises immediate questions about the future of this landmark legislation. Trump has pledged to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act, but analysts are divided on the likelihood of this happening. Some note growing support among congressional Republicans for clean energy initiatives, while others caution that Republicans may use Biden's unspent climate money to help pay for Trump's promised multitrillion-dollar tax cuts.



Despite Trump's rhetoric, his first term saw significant investment and growth in the wind and solar industries. Private sector clean energy investment brought jobs and economic opportunity to small towns and rural communities across the nation. Hundreds of new factories have come online in states that have seen far too many good jobs move overseas.

Moreover, the clean energy sector's momentum may be difficult to halt entirely. Costs for clean energy technologies are falling fast, and companies are under pressure from their customers and investors to deal with climate change. States led by Democrats and Republicans alike are reaping economic benefits from new factories and power plants that have received government support.



Trump's appointment of climate deniers to key roles could hinder clean energy initiatives, but it's unlikely to dismantle the progress made. His proposed tax cuts could influence the future of Biden's climate spending, but it's unclear whether Republicans will repeal these tax credits entirely. Instead, they might use Biden's unspent climate money to help pay for Trump's tax cuts, maintaining a balance between fiscal responsibility and environmental concerns.

In conclusion, while Trump's victory may slow U.S. climate action, it's unlikely to halt clean energy investments. The sector's momentum, driven by falling costs and growing demand, may persist despite regulatory setbacks. However, Trump's administration may be reluctant to advertise climate initiatives, which could hinder broader adoption. Additionally, proposals from Trump allies, such as abolishing federal climate programs and repealing Biden's climate laws, pose risks to climate action. As the U.S. navigates this political landscape, the clean energy sector will need to adapt and continue its transition towards a more sustainable future.