Tokenization's Regulatory Crossroads: Ondo vs. Nasdaq and the Global Innovation Race

---

The battle between Ondo Finance and Nasdaq over tokenized securities is more than a corporate rivalry-it is a microcosm of the broader struggle to define the future of global finance. As the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) weighs Nasdaq's proposal to tokenize stocks and ETFs, Ondo Finance has emerged as a vocal advocate for transparency, equity, and open standards. This clash underscores a pivotal question: Will tokenization be driven by proprietary gatekeepers or democratized through collaborative innovation?

The Ondo-Nasdaq Dispute: A Battle for Fair Access

Nasdaq's September 2025 proposal to tokenize securities via the Depository Trust Company (DTC) aims to integrate blockchain-based assets into traditional markets, as detailed in Nasdaq's rule filing. The plan would allow tokenized shares to settle on-chain while maintaining fungibility with traditional securities, leveraging DTC's infrastructure for post-trade processing, as explained in a Nasdaq Q&A. However, Ondo Finance has raised alarms, arguing that the proposal relies on non-public details about DTC's tokenization framework, as flagged in Ondo's SEC letter. Without full disclosure, Ondo contends, smaller firms and investors face an uneven playing field, as larger institutions may gain early access to proprietary insights, as noted in a Blockonomi analysis.

Ondo's CEO, Nathan Allman, has directly engaged with the SEC to advocate for a regulatory sandbox that balances innovation with investor protection, evidenced by CEO engagement with the SEC. The firm's stance reflects a broader concern: tokenization must not replicate the gatekeeping of legacy finance. By urging the SEC to delay approval until DTC's infrastructure is transparent, Ondo seeks to ensure that all market participants-regardless of size-can evaluate the proposal on equal footing, as Ondo urged the SEC to delay.

Global Regulatory Competition: U.S. vs. EU vs. Asia

The U.S. is not alone in its push for tokenization leadership. The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, enacted in 2025, has positioned Europe as a hub for cross-border tokenized securities, emphasizing passporting rights and harmonized standards, according to a legal roadmap. Meanwhile, Singapore's Monetary Authority (MAS) has pioneered a "principle-based" approach through initiatives like Project Guardian, enabling institutional-grade tokenized bonds while maintaining strict anti-money laundering (AML) controls, as described by Antiér Solutions.

Nasdaq's proposal, if approved, could position the U.S. as a leader in blockchain-integrated markets. However, Ondo's challenge highlights a critical vulnerability: the U.S. risks falling behind if it prioritizes speed over transparency. The EU's MiCA framework, for instance, mandates standardized rules for asset-backed tokens, ensuring interoperability across member states, according to a MiCA analysis. In contrast, the U.S. remains fragmented, with the SEC's cautious stance on tokenization creating uncertainty for innovators, as discussed in an SEC roundtable.

Strategic Implications for Innovation Leadership

The outcome of this regulatory tug-of-war will shape the trajectory of financial innovation. Tokenization promises to reduce settlement delays, enhance liquidity, and democratize access to assets like real estate and private credit, as Keyrock argues. However, its success hinges on infrastructure that is both scalable and equitable.

Nasdaq's approach, while ambitious, risks entrenching existing power structures by relying on DTC's opaque infrastructure. Ondo's counterproposal-open collaboration and transparent standards-aligns with the hybrid model of tokenization, which combines on-chain efficiency with off-chain legal certainty. This model, already adopted by platforms like Tokenized Securities Unveiled, could serve as a blueprint for global adoption.

Conclusion: The SEC's Pivotal Role

The SEC's decision on Nasdaq's proposal will reverberate far beyond the U.S. If it prioritizes speed over transparency, the U.S. risks ceding ground to the EU and Asia, where regulatory frameworks are more cohesive and innovation-friendly. Conversely, a delay to ensure DTC's infrastructure is fully disclosed could foster a level playing field, enabling smaller players like Ondo to thrive.

For investors, the stakes are clear: tokenization's potential to revolutionize finance depends on regulatory clarity and equitable access. As the SEC deliberates, the global race for innovation leadership will hinge on whether tokenization is seen as a tool for democratization or a new form of gatekeeping.

---