TJX's 59.8% Volume Spike Propels 93rd Market Rank as Shares Dip 1.25%

On September 5, 2025, , . , underscoring mixed market sentiment. Recent earnings highlighted TJX’s resilience in a tariff-pressured retail environment. The off-price retailer capitalized on excess inventory from peers, , . Management raised full-year guidance, , assuming stable tariff rates. Despite these improvements, concerns persist over its elevated valuation, , outpacing historical averages.

TJX’s strategy leverages its unique position in the retail sector, benefiting from rivals’ inventory overhangs. This model allowed it to absorb tariff-related costs while maintaining competitive pricing. However, analysts caution that continued growth hinges on sustaining and navigating macroeconomic uncertainties. , but its premium valuation raises questions about long-term sustainability. Management remains optimistic, citing strong guest satisfaction and loyalty program traction as key drivers for future demand.

To make sure I set up the back-test exactly the way you have in mind, I need to confirm a few practical details: 1. Universe: Should we rank all U.S. common stocks (NYSE + NASDAQ + AMEX), or another universe (e.g., S&P 1500, Russell 3000, specific country)? 2. Execution price & timing: Do we “buy at today’s close and sell at tomorrow’s close” (close-to-close), or “buy at tomorrow’s open and sell at tomorrow’s close,” etc.? 3. Portfolio weighting: Equal-weight the 500 names each day, or weight by volume / market-cap / something else? 4. Frictions: Assume zero transaction costs and perfect liquidity, or add commission/slippage? If you’re happy with the following default assumptions, let me know and I’ll run the test straight away: • Universe: all U.S. common stocks (excluding ETFs, ADRs, preferreds). • Execution: buy at the close on the selection day, sell at the next day’s close. • Weighting: equal weight across the 500 tickers. • Transaction costs: none.