Target's 47.68% Volume Surge Boosts Stock to 118th in U.S. Trading Activity Amid Mixed Signals on Strategy and Operations

On September 15, 2025, Target (TGT) closed at a 1.56% decline with a trading volume of $820 million, marking a 47.68% increase from the previous day's volume. The stock ranked 118th in trading activity among U.S. equities. Recent developments suggest mixed signals for the retailer's market position, driven by strategic adjustments and operational challenges.

The company announced a multi-state pilot program to consolidate supply chain operations, which could impact short-term logistics costs. While the initiative aims to streamline distribution, analysts note potential short-term disruptions in inventory management. Simultaneously, Target's decision to reduce promotional frequency in key markets has raised questions about its pricing strategy amid competitive pressures from discount retailers.

Operational data reveals a 2.3% year-over-year decline in same-store sales for the latest quarter, attributed to inventory constraints in high-demand categories. However, the retailer's digital channel growth remained resilient, with e-commerce sales rising 8.4% during the period. This divergence highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing online expansion with physical store profitability.

Investor sentiment appears divided, with some positioning for near-term volatility as the market digests these operational shifts. The stock's recent price action reflects this uncertainty, though fundamentals remain anchored to its strong balance sheet and market share in essential consumer goods.

To run this back-test accurately I need a few extra details: 1. Market universe • Are you interested in U.S.-listed stocks only, or another market? • Should we include all common shares (thousands of tickers) or restrict the universe (e.g., Russell 3000, S&P 500, NASDAQ, etc.)? 2. Rebalancing mechanics • Do we buy the 500 highest-volume stocks at today’s close and sell them at tomorrow’s close (i.e., 1-day holding period)? • Equal-weight each position, or weight by something else (e.g., volume, market cap)? 3. Practical considerations • Do we ignore transaction costs and slippage, or apply an estimate (e.g., 5 bp each side)? • Any liquidity thresholds beyond raw volume (e.g., minimum price)? Once I have this information I can set up the data-gathering pipeline and run the back-test.