La crisis de desinflación de la stablecoin sintética: lecciones de USDe de Ethena y implicaciones para la gestión del riesgo en la DeFi

The rise of synthetic stablecoins in decentralized finance (DeFi) has introduced novel mechanisms for yield generation, but also systemic vulnerabilities. Ethena's USDe, a delta-neutral synthetic dollar, epitomizes both the innovation and fragility of this asset class. By leveraging perpetual futures, staking rewards, and rehypothecation strategies, USDe has attracted billions in capital. However, its structural risks-exacerbated by market volatility and liquidity concentration-highlight critical lessons for risk management in DeFi.

The Mechanics of USDe: A Yield-Generating Synthetic Dollar

USDe operates through a delta-neutral hedging strategy, maintaining long positions in spot crypto assets (e.g., BTC, ETH) and short positions in perpetual futures markets. This structure allows it to capture funding rates from perpetual contracts, which historically averaged 11% annualized in 2024 and ~5% in 2025. Additionally, USDe generates yield from ETH staking and interest on liquid stablecoins like USDC and USDT according to CoinMetrics.

The protocol's profitability hinges on narrow basis spreads and favorable funding rate environments. However, this model is inherently sensitive to market cycles. During bear markets, funding rates for Bitcoin and Ethereum perps often turn negative, eroding USDe's yield and destabilizing its peg. For instance, sUSDe yields plummeted in December 2024, triggering a contraction in USDe supply and repricing of Ethena's perpetual futures (PTs).

Structural Risks: Counterparty Exposure and Liquidity Concentration

USDe's reliance on centralized exchanges (CEXs) for perpetual futures exposes it to counterparty risks. Events like the February 2025 Bybit hack and the October 2025 flash crash underscored this vulnerability, causing temporary depegging and liquidity dislocations. Ethena's insurance fund, valued at ~$35 million in DAI, has been criticized as insufficient relative to its $3+ billion market cap. This undercapitalization raises concerns about its ability to absorb losses during severe downturns.

Further compounding these risks is USDe's integration into DeFi protocols like Aave and Pendle. Over $4.7 billion in Ethena-related deposits on Aave as of 2025 reflect its systemic importance. Users employ recursive leverage strategies, redeploying USDe to mint more sUSDe and amplify yields. While this creates a reflexive growth loop, it also increases systemic leverage, displacing long-term borrowers and heightening Aave's exposure to distressed positions.

Deleveraging Events and Systemic Spillovers

The October 2025 flash crash exemplified the cascading risks of synthetic stablecoins. Negative funding rates and liquidity crunches forced Ethena to liquidate positions, triggering a self-reinforcing deleveraging spiral. Aave's risk oracle system, designed to freeze markets when PT prices fall below thresholds, mitigated some losses but highlighted the fragility of interconnected protocols.

Strata's yield tranching-splitting sUSDe into senior (srUSDe) and junior (jrUSDe) tranches-offers a partial solution. SrUSDe provides a minimum-guaranteed yield, while jrUSDe captures excess returns at higher volatility. This segmentation caters to diverse risk appetites but does not eliminate the underlying exposure to market cycles.

Lessons for DeFi Risk Management

The USDe crisis underscores three critical lessons for DeFi:
1. Insurance Fund Adequacy: Protocols must align insurance reserves with their risk profiles. Ethena's $35 million fund, dwarfed by its $3+ billion market cap, illustrates the dangers of undercapitalization.
2. Diversification of Hedging Strategies: Overreliance on CEXs and perpetual futures necessitates diversified risk mitigation, such as OTC settlements and off-exchange custody.
3. Systemic Leverage Monitoring: Recursive leverage strategies amplify contagion risks. Protocols like Aave must enforce stringent liquidity buffers and dynamic killswitch mechanisms.

Conclusion

Ethena's USDe represents a paradigm shift in stablecoin design, but its structural risks reveal the fragility of yield-generating synthetic assets. As DeFi protocols scale, robust risk management frameworks-encompassing adequate insurance, diversified hedging, and systemic leverage controls-will be paramount to preventing future deleveraging crises. The lessons from USDe's journey are not just cautionary tales but blueprints for building resilient, next-generation stablecoins.