Cambios estratégicos en las relaciones entre Estados Unidos y Venezuela, así como oportunidades de inversión en el sector energético.

The U.S.-Venezuela relationship has entered a pivotal phase, marked by a transition from military intervention to stabilization and energy-focused investment. Following the Trump administration's controversial 2025 operation that ousted President Nicolás Maduro and installed Delcy Rodríguez as interim leader, the geopolitical landscape is shifting toward infrastructure revitalization and oil sector restructuring. This pivot, coupled with Venezuela's release of political prisoners and the U.S. Senate's efforts to curtail further military action, signals a recalibration of priorities. For investors, the implications are clear: a window is opening for large-scale energy investments in Venezuela and broader Latin American markets, albeit with lingering risks that demand careful mitigation.

Geopolitical Risk Mitigation: From Military Action to Policy Clarity

The U.S. Senate's recent war powers resolution to block further military action in Venezuela without congressional approval reflects growing domestic scrutiny of Trump's unilateral interventions. While Trump has vowed to veto the measure, the resolution underscores a shift toward institutionalizing policy clarity-a critical factor for foreign investors. This move aligns with Venezuela's own efforts to stabilize its political environment, including the release of a "large number" of political prisoners, including foreign nationals, as a gesture of "peaceful coexistence". Such actions, though symbolic, reduce the risk of retaliatory measures and create a more predictable governance framework.

For U.S. energy firms, geopolitical risk mitigation is further supported by international legal safeguards. Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanisms under U.S. bilateral treaties provide protections against expropriation and ensure Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) for foreign investments. These frameworks are particularly relevant in Venezuela, where the Trump administration has pledged to leverage legal and diplomatic tools to secure long-term access to the country's oil infrastructure.

Energy Infrastructure Revitalization: A $100 Billion Opportunity

Venezuela's oil sector, once a global powerhouse producing 3.5 million barrels per day (mb/d), now operates at less than 500,000 mb/d due to decades of mismanagement and sanctions. The U.S. has positioned itself to lead the sector's revival, with Trump announcing that American oil majors like Chevron will spearhead infrastructure rebuilding. This includes workover programs to boost production by 500,000 mb/d within 18 months, at a cost of several billion dollars.

The strategic rationale is twofold: first, to redirect Venezuela's oil exports from China-its former primary buyer-to U.S.-aligned markets; second, to undermine China's $10–12 billion in outstanding debt tied to oil shipments. By securing control over Venezuela's crude flows, the U.S. aims to strengthen its influence in Latin America while reducing non-hemispheric competitors' footholds. For investors, this creates opportunities in upstream infrastructure, refining, and logistics. Gulf Coast refiners, for instance, stand to benefit from Venezuela's heavy crude, which aligns with their refining capabilities.

Regional Implications and Risk Frameworks

The U.S. intervention has broader implications for Latin American energy partnerships. By framing Venezuela's oil sector as a model for "legitimate and authorized channels", the administration has implicitly warned regional leaders-particularly in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Colombia-against deepening ties with China, Russia, or Iran. This signals a strategic push to realign energy flows with U.S. interests, potentially reshaping regional supply chains.

However, the historical volatility of U.S. interventions in Latin America necessitates caution. While a successful transition in Venezuela could stabilize the region and facilitate the return of millions of refugees, prolonged instability risks new migration waves and geopolitical friction. For investors, this underscores the importance of hedging against policy shifts and oil price volatility. Gold, for example, has seen increased demand as a safe-haven asset amid the uncertainty.

The Path Forward: Policy Assurances and Market Confidence

The long-term viability of U.S. investments in Venezuela hinges on political stability and legal clarity. Trump's promise of subsidies for oil companies to rebuild infrastructure is a step in this direction, but firms remain hesitant without guarantees against future expropriation. The interim government, led by Delcy Rodríguez, has emphasized cooperation with U.S. firms, but its ability to maintain this alignment will depend on domestic pressures and international scrutiny.

For the broader Latin American energy transition, structured frameworks such as competitive auctions and long-term power purchase agreements are gaining traction. These mechanisms, combined with U.S. policy assurances, could attract private capital to renewable projects while ensuring fossil fuel investments remain viable in a low-carbon world.

Conclusion

The U.S.-Venezuela relationship is at a crossroads, with energy infrastructure revitalization emerging as a central pillar of the new geopolitical order. While Trump's military actions have drawn criticism, the shift toward stabilization and investment offers a path to renewed U.S. capital inflows into Latin American energy markets. For investors, the key lies in balancing the promise of high-impact projects with robust risk mitigation strategies-leveraging legal safeguards, policy clarity, and diversified portfolios to navigate the region's complex dynamics.