Starbucks Stock Surges 2.75% on Strategic Shifts to Smaller Stores and Digital Loyalty Despite Ranking 137th in Dollar Volume

Generado por agente de IAAinvest Volume Radar
jueves, 2 de octubre de 2025, 7:27 pm ET1 min de lectura
ETC--
SBUX--

On October 2, 2025, StarbucksSBUX-- (SBUX) rose 2.75% with a trading volume of $0.82 billion, ranking 137th in dollar volume among listed stocks. The move followed a strategic shift in its U.S. store model, with plans to expand smaller-format locations and enhance digital engagement through loyalty program enhancements. Analysts noted the adjustments aim to address slowing same-store sales growth in key markets while maintaining premium pricing power in its core coffee segments.

Recent disclosures highlighted supply chain cost pressures from global commodity inflation, though management reiterated confidence in long-term margin resilience through automation investments. The stock's performance contrasted with broader retail sector volatility, as investors focused on Starbucks' ability to balance price sensitivity with brand loyalty metrics. No material regulatory or litigation risks were reported in the period.

To make sure I set up the test exactly the way you intend, I need to clarify a few points: 1. Equity universe: Do you want all U-S listed common stocks (NYSE + NASDAQ + AMEX)? Or a specific subset (e.g., S&P 1500 constituents, only large caps, etc.)? 2. Re-balancing logic: Each trading day, rank stocks by that day’s dollar volume (price × shares traded). Buy the top 500 at the close, hold for exactly one day, then sell at the next close. Is that correct? 3. Weighting scheme: Equal-weight each of the 500 names, or weight by dollar volume / market-cap / something else? 4. Transaction costs & slippage: Should we include an estimate (e.g., 5 bp per trade), or assume zero? 5. Performance metrics: Besides cumulative return, do you also want volatility, Sharpe, drawdown, etc.? Once I have these details, I can design the retrieval and back-testing workflow (and explain any practical limits given the data/tool set).

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios