La Batalla de Recompensas de Stablecoins: Implicaciones para Coinbase y el Liderazgo del Mercado Criptográfico en los EE. UU.

The U.S. crypto market stands at a crossroads as regulators grapple with the dual imperatives of investor protection and fostering innovation. For Coinbase, a company that has long positioned itself as a bridge between traditional finance and digital assets, the evolving regulatory landscape-particularly around stablecoin rewards-poses both strategic risks and opportunities. The recent dismissal of the SEC's enforcement action against Coinbase, coupled with the passage of the GENIUS and CLARITY Acts, signals a shift toward a more structured but cautious approach to digital assets. Yet, as global competitors like the EU, Singapore, and Hong Kong roll out their own stablecoin frameworks, the U.S. faces a critical question: Can it balance regulatory clarity with the flexibility needed to maintain its leadership in the crypto space?

The U.S. Regulatory Tightrope

The SEC's decision to drop its case against Coinbase in February 2025 marked a pivotal moment. While the dismissal was framed as a step toward collaborative rulemaking, it also underscored the agency's ongoing struggle to define the boundaries of securities law in the context of digital assets. The new regulatory focus on the Crypto Task Force's work has led to clearer definitions, such as the SEC's statement that "Covered Stablecoins" are not securities according to SEC guidance. However, the debate over stablecoin yield remains contentious. U.S. banks have lobbied aggressively against allowing stablecoin issuers to pass on interest from reserve assets to holders, arguing this could destabilize traditional banking systems. Coinbase, meanwhile, has emphasized that such restrictions risk stifling innovation and ceding ground to jurisdictions with more accommodating frameworks.

The GENIUS Act, signed into law in July 2025, has provided a federal framework for payment stablecoins, requiring full reserves and monthly transparency reports. While this has spurred institutional adoption- evidenced by SoFi's launch of SoFiUSD-it also prohibits yield on stablecoins, a feature that crypto firms argue is essential for user engagement and growth. For Coinbase, which has integrated stablecoin rewards into its staking and lending platforms, this regulatory ambiguity creates a strategic risk: either adapt to a yield-free model or face potential fragmentation in user adoption.

Global Competitors and the Race for Innovation

While the U.S. debates yield restrictions, other jurisdictions are accelerating their stablecoin frameworks. The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, fully effective in 2025, has set a high bar for reserve adequacy and audit requirements, but it also allows for innovation within a structured environment. Singapore's Payment Services Act and Hong Kong's Stablecoins Ordinance have similarly prioritized transparency while enabling stablecoin issuance by licensed entities. These frameworks, though rigorous, offer a degree of flexibility that the U.S. currently lacks.

Japan's approach under the Payment Services Act (PSA) provides a compelling case study. By classifying fiat-pegged stablecoins as "electronic payment instruments" (EPIs), Japan has created a regulatory sandbox that balances consumer protection with innovation. The FSA's 2025 amendments relaxed reserve requirements for trust-type stablecoins, allowing issuers to hold up to 50% of their reserves in low-risk assets like government bonds. This has enabled entities like JPYC to launch Japan's first licensed stablecoin, backed by major banks and offering a model for scalable, regulated stablecoin adoption. For Coinbase, which has historically focused on U.S. markets, the rise of such frameworks in Asia and Europe raises the risk of losing market share to local players who can navigate these rules more nimbly.

Strategic Risks and the Path Forward

Coinbase's Q4 2025 outlook highlights the tension between regulatory clarity and market dynamics. While the firm welcomes the CLARITY Act's bipartisan support, it also warns of liquidity fragility and the uncertainty surrounding digital-asset treasury (DAT) models. The prohibition on stablecoin yield under the GENIUS Act could further complicate Coinbase's ability to compete with platforms that offer rewards as a core value proposition.

Globally, the stakes are rising. Over 70% of jurisdictions have advanced stablecoin frameworks since 2023, with Hong Kong's $25 million capital requirements and Singapore's emphasis on operational transparency setting benchmarks for institutional trust. For the U.S. to retain its leadership, policymakers must address the yield debate without compromising financial stability. Coinbase, for its part, must navigate this uncertainty by leveraging its institutional partnerships and advocating for a regulatory environment that balances innovation with oversight.

Conclusion

The stablecoin rewards battle is not just a technical debate-it is a test of the U.S.'s ability to reconcile its regulatory ethos with the demands of a globalized digital economy. While the SEC's recent shift toward collaboration is a positive step, the absence of a clear stance on yield risks leaving the U.S. behind in the race for crypto innovation. For Coinbase, the path forward will require agility in adapting to domestic constraints while capitalizing on opportunities in markets where regulatory clarity and flexibility align with its strategic vision.