El empuje de Corea del Sur por la moneda estable estratégica y los riesgos de la soberanía monetaria

South Korea's 2025 stablecoin strategy is emerging as a pivotal element of its broader digital finance agenda, with policymakers and regulators racing to institutionalize won-backed stablecoins amid a rapidly evolving global landscape. The country's efforts to formalize a legal and regulatory framework for these digital assets-rooted in the proposed Digital Asset Basic Act-reflect both ambition and caution. While the potential to enhance cross-border trade efficiency and secure a foothold in the $500–750 billion stablecoin market according to research is significant, the risks to monetary sovereignty and regulatory coherence remain pressing concerns for investors.

A Framework for Stability and Sovereignty

South Korea's approach to stablecoins is anchored in the Digital Asset Basic Act, a legislative initiative designed to eliminate regulatory ambiguity and establish clear parameters for issuance and use according to the act. By recognizing cryptocurrencies as digital assets, the act aims to attract institutional players, including traditional banks, to issue won-backed stablecoins under the oversight of the Bank of Korea (BOK). This aligns with the BOK's emphasis on maintaining financial integrity through regulated channels, mirroring the safeguards of traditional banking systems.

Lawmakers such as Rep. Min Byoung-dug have underscored the urgency of this move, warning that South Korea's payment sovereignty is at risk if it lags behind the global adoption of stablecoins.

The U.S. GENIUS Act, which mandates reserve transparency and accountability for stablecoin issuers, serves as a model for South Korea's regulatory ambitions. However, the country's unique challenge lies in balancing innovation with the need to preserve the won's dominance in domestic and international transactions.

Global Context: Competition and Regulatory Divergence

Globally, the stablecoin market is dominated by U.S. dollar (USD)-backed assets, with Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) accounting for the lion's share of market capitalization. Euro-backed stablecoins, by contrast, remain niche, with a total market cap of €395 million as of November 2025 according to data. South Korea's won-backed stablecoins face an uphill battle in this landscape, compounded by the lack of a globally recognized regulatory framework for non-USD/EUR/RMB stablecoins.

China's dual approach to stablecoins offers a cautionary tale. While the mainland enforces a strict ban on private stablecoins to preserve monetary sovereignty, Hong Kong has pioneered a licensing regime for RMB-backed stablecoins under the Stablecoins Ordinance. This duality highlights the tension between innovation and control-a dynamic South Korea must navigate as it seeks to avoid regulatory arbitrage while fostering institutional adoption.

Investment Implications: Opportunities and Risks

For investors, South Korea's stablecoin push presents both opportunities and risks. The country's 8th-place ranking on the 2025 Country Crypto Adoption Index signals a maturing market, with professional traders and institutional players increasingly engaging with digital assets. The BOK's endorsement of won-backed stablecoins issued by regulated banks according to the law could catalyze adoption in cross-border trade settlements, particularly with neighboring economies like China and Japan.

However, the risks are non-trivial. First, the dominance of USD stablecoins-backed by robust regulatory frameworks in the U.S. and EU-poses a competitive threat. Second, the potential for private stablecoins to undermine central bank authority, as seen in China's resistance to RMB-backed alternatives, raises questions about South Korea's long-term monetary policy flexibility. Third, global regulatory fragmentation could stifle interoperability, limiting the scalability of won-backed stablecoins in international markets.

Navigating the Path Forward

South Korea's success in this arena will hinge on its ability to harmonize regulatory clarity with global standards. The Digital Asset Basic Act is a critical first step, but further alignment with frameworks like the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) may be necessary to attract cross-border institutional capital. Additionally, partnerships with blockchain-native financial infrastructure providers-such as those leveraging public blockchains for efficiency-could enhance the appeal of won-backed stablecoins.

For investors, the key takeaway is that South Korea's stablecoin strategy is not a standalone play but a component of a broader geopolitical and financial realignment. While the potential for cross-border trade innovation is substantial, the risks to monetary sovereignty and regulatory coherence demand careful scrutiny. As the BOK and lawmakers finalize their approach, the coming months will reveal whether South Korea can secure a competitive edge-or if it will find itself playing catch-up in a USD-dominated world.