¿Es sostenible la reciente alza de precio de Solana en medio de métricas divergentes en la cadena?

The Solana (SOL) ecosystem has long been a focal point for investors seeking high-throughput blockchain solutions, but its recent price action has sparked heated debate. While the token has rallied amid bullish on-chain activity and institutional adoption, technical indicators suggest a fragile market structure. This analysis examines whether Solana's price surge is rooted in sustainable network growth or speculative fervor, dissecting diverging signals from on-chain metrics, validator economics, and technical chart patterns.

Technical Divergence: Bearish Momentum vs. Institutional Resilience

Solana's price action in late 2025 has painted a mixed picture. The token broke below the critical $150 support level in November, with trading volume surging 13% above weekly averages during the decline-a sign of institutional selling pressure. A bearish structure is forming, characterized by lower highs from the $157.25 peak and accelerating downside momentum. Immediate support now lies between $142 and $144, with a breakdown below $135–$140 potentially signaling deeper weakness.

Yet, short-term fundamentals remain robust. Despite a 55% drawdown from its January 2025 all-time high of $294, Solana's total value locked (TVL) in DeFi applications grew by 18% year-to-date, driven by AI-native dApps and tokenization projects. On-chain metrics like the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) and volume also confirm real demand, with positive inflows into spot Solana ETFs continuing despite broader market outflows. This divergence between technical weakness and fundamental resilience raises questions about the sustainability of the rally.

On-Chain Metrics: Growth Amid Declining User Activity

Solana's on-chain data reveals a paradox. The network processed 34 billion transactions in 2025, 18 times more than BNB and outpacing Ethereum in annual fee revenue ($2.85 billion), driven by DeFi and AI dApps. Staking metrics also show strength, with 415 million SOL staked by Q3-75% of total supply-and institutional capital inflows reaching $530 million. Native staking protocols like Marinade saw TVL surge 21% quarter-over-quarter to 5.3 million SOL, surpassing liquid staking products.

However, user activity has declined. Daily active addresses fell 5.59% compared to earlier 2025, hitting a 12-month low of 3.3 million. Whale transactions, while showing increased institutional accumulation, also highlight concentration risks. For instance, record inflows into Solana-based ETFs in December 2025 suggest speculative positioning. This tension between institutional adoption and declining retail participation complicates the narrative of organic growth.

Validator Economics: Innovation vs. Centralization Risks

Solana's validator landscape is both a strength and a vulnerability. Protocol upgrades like Firedancer and Alpenglow have enhanced scalability, reducing finality times and boosting network reliability. Validator economics also improved with SIMD-96, which directed 100% of priority fees to validators, increasing their revenue streams. For example, Figment's Q2 2025 Staking Rewards Rate (SRR) reached 7.45%, bolstered by MEV contributions.

Yet, the validator count has plummeted by 68% over two years, leaving only ~800 active nodes-a drop that raises decentralization concerns. The cost to break even for validators now exceeds $17 million per block, prompting some to unstake as economic pressures mount. While MEV and block rewards offset inflationary disinflation (-15% annually), the network's security and decentralization remain under scrutiny.

Is the Rally Speculative or Sustainable?

The data suggests a hybrid narrative. Solana's technical breakdown below key support levels and declining user activity point to speculative overhangs. However, its fundamentals-strong TVL growth, institutional staking inflows, and protocol upgrades-underscore long-term potential. The recent price action may reflect short-term profit-taking by whales and ETF investors rather than a collapse in network value.

For the rally to be sustainable, Solana must retest and hold above $135–$140, signaling renewed buying interest. Meanwhile, validator upgrades and institutional adoption could drive a re-rating of the asset's utility. The key question is whether the market will differentiate between temporary volatility and structural growth.

Conclusion

Solana's recent price rally is a tale of two forces: bearish technical momentum and resilient fundamentals. While on-chain metrics like TVL and staking activity highlight the network's economic importance, declining user participation and validator centralization risks cannot be ignored. Investors must weigh the short-term technical risks against the long-term potential of Solana's ecosystem. For now, the market appears to be pricing in optimism about institutional adoption, but a sustained recovery will depend on whether the network can convert speculative inflows into durable user growth.