Simon Property Group Surges 1.52% on $250M Volume Ranking 409th Amid Retail Strategy Shifts and Capital Plan Adjustments

Simon Property Group (SPG) rose 1.52% on Sept. 26, with a trading volume of $250 million, ranking 409th in market activity. The REIT's performance was influenced by a combination of sector-specific developments and operational updates. Recent reports highlighted a shift in consumer spending patterns toward experiential retail formats, aligning with SPG's strategy to revitalize mall assets through mixed-use developments. Analysts noted that the company's third-quarter leasing activity showed a 12% year-over-year increase in premium tenant renewals, reflecting improved tenant retention rates in its core markets.

Market participants also observed that SPG's revised capital allocation framework, announced in late August, contributed to investor confidence. The updated plan prioritizes debt reduction and strategic redevelopment projects over stock buybacks, addressing concerns about leverage ratios. While the S&P 500 Industrial REITs sub-index remained flat, SPG outperformed peers due to its focus on high-barrier markets and defensive retail positioning. Short-term technical indicators suggest continued consolidation near key support levels amid broader retail sector volatility.

To run this back-test I need a bit more detail so I can build the data-retrieval plan correctly and make sure the results mean what you expect: 1. Market & universe • Do you want all U.S. common stocks (≈3,500 tickers) or a narrower universe such as the Russell 3000, S&P 500, or another list? • ADRs, ETFs, preferreds, etc. — include or exclude? 2. Portfolio construction • Weighting: equal-weight across the 500 names each day, or volume-weighted / cap-weighted? • Rebalance frequency: you said “hold for 1 day”; just to confirm, the portfolio is re-formed every trading day at the close, held through the next day’s close, then fully rebalanced again? 3. Frictional costs (optional) • Should we apply any transaction cost or slippage assumption, or ignore costs? Once I have these items I can generate the data plan and run the back-test.