Senate DeFi Battle Risks Smothering Innovation as Critics Warn of Regulatory Overreach
Charles Hoskinson, founder of CardanoADA--, has criticized a proposed Senate Democrats' DeFi regulation as a "kill switch," arguing it would grant the U.S. Treasury unchecked authority to blacklist protocols without judicial oversight [6]. The proposal, which emerged during contentious bipartisan negotiations, would impose Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements on DeFi frontends-including non-custodial wallets-and strip legal protections from developers [1]. Critics, including prominent industry figures, warn the plan could effectively ban decentralized finance in the U.S. and push innovation overseas .
The Democratic proposal, led by senators such as Ruben Gallego and Mark Warner, seeks to create a "restricted list" of DeFi protocols deemed too risky, with penalties for U.S. nationals using them [1]. It clashes with the Senate Banking Committee's bipartisan Responsible Financial Innovation Act (RFIA), which aims to assign oversight to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) while protecting developers from prosecution [3]. GOP leaders suspended talks after receiving the proposal, calling it incoherent and a bad-faith effort [1].
Industry leaders have strongly opposed the plan. Jake Chervinsky, a crypto lawyer, described it as an "unprecedented, unconstitutional government takeover of an entire industry" that would eliminate opportunities for structured market frameworks [1]. Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger warned it would make compliance "impossible," pushing development "offshore" [2]. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called it a "bad proposal, plain and simple," that would hinder U.S. leadership in crypto innovation [3].
The proposal also faces criticism for its broad definition of intermediaries, potentially criminalizing developers and frontend operators [6]. Critics argue that regulating code or governance, rather than targeting real illicit finance chokepoints, creates regulatory uncertainty . The Treasury Department's 2023 DeFi risk assessment highlighted vulnerabilities in AML/CFT compliance but stopped short of defining a regulatory framework [7].
Political tensions have intensified as Democrats and Republicans clash over process and substance. Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott's office criticized Democrats for delaying markup dates, while Gallego's team defended their approach as substantive [1]. The dispute risks derailing efforts to pass crypto legislation before year-end, with the House's CLARITY Act (294–134) serving as a contrast to the Senate's fragmented approach .
Market reactions suggest regulatory uncertainty is already impacting sentiment. DeFi market capitalization fell 3.4% following the proposal's release, with tokens like Hyperliquid (HYPE) and AstarASTR-- (ASTR) experiencing significant declines . Analysts warn that continued gridlock could shift crypto activity to jurisdictions like the EU, where MiCA regulations are more defined .



Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios