Senate DeFi Battle Risks Smothering Innovation as Critics Warn of Regulatory Overreach

Generado por agente de IACoin World
viernes, 10 de octubre de 2025, 7:18 pm ET1 min de lectura
ADA--
ASTR--

Charles Hoskinson, founder of CardanoADA--, has criticized a proposed Senate Democrats' DeFi regulation as a "kill switch," arguing it would grant the U.S. Treasury unchecked authority to blacklist protocols without judicial oversight US Senate Democrats Push Crackdown on DeFi Frontends[6]. The proposal, which emerged during contentious bipartisan negotiations, would impose Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements on DeFi frontends-including non-custodial wallets-and strip legal protections from developers Democrats Propose 'Restricted List' for DeFi Protocols in Bill That ...[1]. Critics, including prominent industry figures, warn the plan could effectively ban decentralized finance in the U.S. and push innovation overseas .

The Democratic proposal, led by senators such as Ruben Gallego and Mark Warner, seeks to create a "restricted list" of DeFi protocols deemed too risky, with penalties for U.S. nationals using them Democrats Propose 'Restricted List' for DeFi Protocols in Bill That ...[1]. It clashes with the Senate Banking Committee's bipartisan Responsible Financial Innovation Act (RFIA), which aims to assign oversight to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) while protecting developers from prosecution Democrats Implement Counter-Measure to Restrict DeFi Protocols[3]. GOP leaders suspended talks after receiving the proposal, calling it incoherent and a bad-faith effort Democrats Propose 'Restricted List' for DeFi Protocols in Bill That ...[1].

Industry leaders have strongly opposed the plan. Jake Chervinsky, a crypto lawyer, described it as an "unprecedented, unconstitutional government takeover of an entire industry" that would eliminate opportunities for structured market frameworks Democrats Propose 'Restricted List' for DeFi Protocols in Bill That ...[1]. Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger warned it would make compliance "impossible," pushing development "offshore" DeFi Under Fire: Democrats Propose ’Restricted List’ That Could ...[2]. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called it a "bad proposal, plain and simple," that would hinder U.S. leadership in crypto innovation Democrats Implement Counter-Measure to Restrict DeFi Protocols[3].

The proposal also faces criticism for its broad definition of intermediaries, potentially criminalizing developers and frontend operators US Senate Democrats Push Crackdown on DeFi Frontends[6]. Critics argue that regulating code or governance, rather than targeting real illicit finance chokepoints, creates regulatory uncertainty . The Treasury Department's 2023 DeFi risk assessment highlighted vulnerabilities in AML/CFT compliance but stopped short of defining a regulatory framework ‘Too big to remain in limbo’: Democrats unveil crypto oversight plan[7].

Political tensions have intensified as Democrats and Republicans clash over process and substance. Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott's office criticized Democrats for delaying markup dates, while Gallego's team defended their approach as substantive Democrats Propose 'Restricted List' for DeFi Protocols in Bill That ...[1]. The dispute risks derailing efforts to pass crypto legislation before year-end, with the House's CLARITY Act (294–134) serving as a contrast to the Senate's fragmented approach .

Market reactions suggest regulatory uncertainty is already impacting sentiment. DeFi market capitalization fell 3.4% following the proposal's release, with tokens like Hyperliquid (HYPE) and AstarASTR-- (ASTR) experiencing significant declines . Analysts warn that continued gridlock could shift crypto activity to jurisdictions like the EU, where MiCA regulations are more defined .

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios