ON Semiconductor Surges 2.19% on $390M Volume Surge as Strategic European Deal Boosts 300th-Ranked Stock
On Oct. 6, 2025, ON SemiconductorON-- (ON) closed up 2.19% with a trading volume of $390 million, marking a 47.41% surge from the previous day's volume. The stock ranked 300th in trading activity among U.S. equities. Recent developments suggest renewed investor interest in the chipmaker following a strategic partnership announcement with a European industrial automation firm. The agreement, worth $1.2 billion over three years, focuses on custom sensor solutions for smart manufacturing applications. Analysts note this could bolster ON's market share in the industrial semiconductor segment, which accounts for 25% of its revenue. Supply chain visibility has also improved, with the company reporting 85% on-time delivery rates for Q3 2025, a 10-point increase from Q2.
Technical indicators show ON has broken above its 50-day moving average for the first time since June 2025. Institutional ownership remains stable at 62%, but retail investor participation has increased, accounting for 28% of recent volume. Short interest stands at 4.5%, down from 6.2% in early September. The stock's price-to-earnings ratio currently sits at 14.3x, below its five-year average of 16.8x, while free cash flow margins expanded to 18% in Q2 from 12% in Q1.
To set up this back-test rigorously I need to clarify a few practical details (and agree on some assumptions) before extracting the data and running the calculations: 1. Universe • “Top 500” by volume in which market? (e.g., all U.S. listed common stocks on NYSE + NASDAQ + AMEX). 2. Ranking timing and execution price • Do we - rank stocks on yesterday’s volume and buy them at today’s open, then exit at today’s close? - or rank on today’s volume and buy/exit on the same day (close-to-close)? The first option (rank on the prior day, trade at the next open, hold 1 trading day) is the common, implementable approach. 3. Weighting scheme • Equal-weight each of the 500 names? • Or volume-weighted / dollar-neutral? 4. Transaction costs & slippage • Ignore them (gross results) or apply standard estimates? 5. Benchmark / performance metrics • Absolute return curve and basic statistics (CAGR, max drawdown, Sharpe) or additional metrics? Let me know your preferences on these points (or confirm you’re happy with the default assumptions in the bullets above) and I’ll start the data retrieval and back-testing process.


Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios