Aumento del riesgo geopolítico y regulatorio en la aplicación de las leyes de inmigración en los EE. UU.: Impactos en la valoración inmobiliaria y empresarial a nivel regional

The intersection of U.S. immigration enforcement policies and regional real estate dynamics has emerged as a critical factor for investors in 2023–2025. As regulatory shifts and geopolitical uncertainties reshape labor markets and demographic trends, the ripple effects on real estate valuations and local business ecosystems are becoming increasingly pronounced. This analysis examines how immigration enforcement-coupled with policy-driven labor shortages and geopolitical volatility-has altered market fundamentals in key U.S. regions, offering insights for investors navigating this evolving landscape.

Labor Market Disruptions and Construction Costs

Immigration enforcement measures, including ICE raids and deportation campaigns, have disrupted labor markets in construction and food production, sectors heavily reliant on immigrant labor. According to a report by , these disruptions have driven up wages and construction costs, leading to project delays and higher housing prices. For instance, construction firms in Houston reported that 92% of firms faced labor shortages, with 45% attributing project delays directly to immigration enforcement. This inflationary pressure has cascaded into real estate development, where rising costs and constrained supply are exacerbating affordability challenges.

Regional Case Studies: Houston, Phoenix, and Nashville

Houston has become a bellwether for the impact of immigration policy on real estate. A decline in immigration-linked to heightened enforcement-has led to reduced occupancy rates in rental properties and a 24% drop in home searches by international buyers in 2025. Local businesses, particularly in immigrant-rich neighborhoods, have also suffered. In Chicago's Little Village, mass deportations under "Operation Midway Blitz" caused a 60% sales decline for businesses like Moreno's liquor store, as immigrant consumer spending contracted.

Meanwhile, Phoenix and Nashville have seen real estate valuations rise due to domestic migration and secondary market demand. Phoenix's median home price hit $475,000 in 2025, driven by population growth and suburban expansion. Nashville's multifamily market anticipates a 2.1% rent increase by late 2025, supported by a 92.1% occupancy rate. However, these gains are not directly tied to immigration policy but rather to broader demographic shifts, underscoring the nuanced interplay between enforcement and market dynamics.

Regulatory Shifts and Geopolitical Uncertainty

New immigration policies, such as the $100,000 H1B visa application fee introduced in 2025, have curtailed skilled labor inflows to tech hubs like Silicon Valley and Austin, cooling home prices by 2–5% in these regions. Conversely, the "gold card" program-offering residency to wealthy investors- risks inflating housing costs in high-demand areas, mirroring trends in European and Asian real estate-linked visa programs.

Geopolitical events, including U.S. elections and global conflicts, have further compounded uncertainty. The Counselors of Real Estate note that political volatility complicates real estate transactions, with investors adopting a "wait and see" approach. For example, the 2024–2025 election cycle introduced unpredictability around corporate tax policies, directly affecting capital allocation decisions.

Quantifiable Impacts and Investor Implications

The dual effects of immigration policy-on both demand and labor supply-are reshaping real estate fundamentals. Immigration-driven household formation added 700,000 new renters between 2022 and 2024, but this tailwind has waned as immigration levels normalized. In Houston, construction labor shortages have slowed housing supply growth, while in Phoenix, domestic migration has offset some of these losses. Investors must now weigh the risks of policy-driven labor constraints against opportunities in secondary markets with strong domestic demand.

For commercial real estate, the decline in immigrant entrepreneurship has reduced demand for retail and industrial spaces in diverse districts. However, cities like Phoenix are capitalizing on industrial real estate booms due to their strategic locations and affordability.

Conclusion

The interplay of immigration enforcement, regulatory shifts, and geopolitical risks has created a fragmented real estate landscape. While enforcement-driven labor shortages and policy uncertainty weigh on construction and rental markets, secondary cities are emerging as resilient alternatives. Investors must prioritize regions with diversified labor pools, robust domestic migration, and adaptive regulatory frameworks to mitigate risks. As the U.S. grapples with the long-term implications of its immigration policies, real estate valuations will remain closely tied to the evolving balance between enforcement and economic integration.