El aumento del coste del riesgo cibernético en los ecosistemas Web3 y DeFi: estrategias de inversión en ciberseguridad y seguro para hacer frente a los riesgos

Generado por agente de IALiam AlfordRevisado porTianhao Xu
martes, 30 de diciembre de 2025, 1:10 am ET3 min de lectura

The Web3 and decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems have emerged as transformative forces in global finance, yet their rapid growth has been shadowed by escalating cyber risks. In 2023 alone, cyberattacks on DeFi platforms and Web3 projects resulted in $1.95 billion in losses across 448 incidents, with private key compromises alone accounting for

. By 2024, the situation had worsened: total losses reached $2.3 billion, with . These figures underscore a critical juncture for investors and developers alike: the need to treat cybersecurity infrastructure and insurance solutions not as optional add-ons but as strategic hedges against systemic risk.

The Escalating Threat Landscape

The 2024 data reveals a troubling trajectory. Q1 losses totaled $517 million, rising to $669 million by Q3, with the third quarter alone witnessing

. Notable breaches, such as the $305 million DMM Bitcoin hack and the $290 million PlayDapp exploit, highlight the sophistication of attackers. Flash loan attacks, liquidity pool manipulations, and cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities have become . Meanwhile, the rise of "fake sandwich attacks" and AI-driven governance exploits signals a shift toward sophisticated, multi-layered threats .

Despite these challenges, recovery rates have improved slightly, with

. However, this pales in comparison to the scale of losses, emphasizing the limitations of reactive measures. As one industry analyst notes, ", and traditional security paradigms are ill-equipped to address its unique vulnerabilities."

Cybersecurity Infrastructure: A Growing but Underdeveloped Market

The demand for robust cybersecurity solutions in Web3 has spurred innovation. In 2024, the DeFi market size grew to $231.19 billion,

. This growth has driven adoption of zero-knowledge proofs, multi-party computation (MPC), and smart contract audits to secure decentralized applications (dApps) and token custody systems .

Key players like Hacken and Cyvers have emerged as leaders in threat detection and incident response. For instance, Hacken's 2024 report identified

, while Cyvers highlighted the role of . These insights have informed the development of proactive tools, such as .

However, gaps persist. The $120 million BadgerDAO hack in 2023 exposed the limitations of current frameworks, as

. This case illustrates the need for granular risk categorization in cybersecurity infrastructure, distinguishing between protocol-level flaws and user-side vulnerabilities.

DeFi Insurance: A Niche with Explosive Potential

The DeFi insurance market, valued at $2.1 billion in 2024, is

, reaching $10 billion by 2033. Platforms like Nexus Mutual, Cover Protocol, and Solace now offer coverage for smart contract failures, liquidity pool losses, and custodial theft . For example, Solace's hedging policies for protocols like and provide liquidity providers with protection against exploits .

Yet, the sector remains nascent. In 2023-2024, only $34.4 million was paid out in claims despite $3.1 billion in DeFi hacks

. This disparity reflects both the underdevelopment of insurance models and the reluctance of platforms to underwrite high-risk protocols. Nevertheless, the market is evolving. Parametric insurance, which automates payouts via blockchain oracles, has shown promise. For instance, uses smart contracts to instantly disburse funds for train delays, a model adaptable to DeFi's high-speed environment.

Regulatory clarity is also accelerating adoption.

have provided insurers with a legal foundation to expand coverage. As one industry report notes, " from a speculative niche into a critical infrastructure layer."

Strategic Investment: Balancing Risk and Reward

For investors, the case for cybersecurity infrastructure and insurance is compelling. The DeFi insurance market's 25% CAGR dwarfs traditional insurance growth rates, while cybersecurity firms like Safeheron and Cyvers are capitalizing on the

. Moreover, the integration of AI with blockchain infrastructure-such as AI-driven governance platforms-has created new demand for cybersecurity-as-a-service (CSaaS) models .

However, risks remain.

highlights the volatility of the sector, while regulatory shifts could disrupt existing models. Investors must also weigh the moral hazard of insuring protocols with known vulnerabilities. For example, -caused by insider manipulation-reveals the limitations of insurance in addressing governance flaws.

Conclusion: A Call for Proactive Hedging

The Web3 and DeFi ecosystems are at a crossroads. While their potential to disrupt traditional finance is undeniable,

demand a paradigm shift. Cybersecurity infrastructure and insurance solutions are no longer optional-they are essential components of a resilient financial system.

For investors, the path forward is clear: allocate capital to firms pioneering zero-knowledge proofs, AI-driven threat detection, and parametric insurance models. These innovations will not only mitigate losses but also unlock the full potential of decentralized finance. As the adage goes, "Those who ignore risk management in DeFi are playing with fire-and the flames are already spreading."

author avatar
Liam Alford

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios