Regulatory Gridlock Pits Innovation Against Safeguards in DeFi Battle
The U.S. Senate's debate over decentralized finance (DeFi) regulation has intensified, reflecting a deepening ideological divide over the future of digital assets. A bipartisan effort to pass the Digital Asset Market Structure Act, aimed at clarifying regulatory oversight and investor protections, has stalled amid fierce disagreements between Republicans and Democrats. The proposed bill seeks to define the roles of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), with Republicans advocating for a framework that prioritizes innovation and Democrats emphasizing consumer safeguards. [1]
Central to the conflict is the jurisdictional dispute between the SEC and CFTC. The SEC argues that most tokens qualify as securities under the Howey Test, while the CFTC treats them as commodities. The bill draft would assign fungible digital commodities like BitcoinBTC-- and EthereumETH-- to the CFTC, leaving the SEC to regulate tokenized securities. Critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, contend this split risks regulatory fragmentation and weakens investor protections. [1]
In a separate but related development, the Senate voted 70-27 to repeal the IRS's DeFi broker rule, which had required platforms to report user transactions to the IRS. The repeal, championed by Senator Ted Cruz, was hailed as a victory for innovation, with supporters arguing the rule imposed unrealistic compliance burdens on decentralized platforms. The resolution now moves to the House for final approval. [2] This action aligns with broader efforts to ease regulatory pressure on DeFi, including the Responsible Financial Innovation Act (RFIA), a bipartisan draft that seeks to protect developers and define airtight legal exemptions for decentralized protocols. [3]
However, progress has been complicated by Democratic proposals that have drawn industry backlash. A counter-offer from Senate Banking Committee Democrats, led by Mark Warner and Ruben Gallego, would empower the Treasury to create a "restricted list" of high-risk DeFi protocols and impose Know Your Customer (KYC) rules on non-custodial wallets. Critics, including the Blockchain Association and crypto lawyers, argue this effectively bans DeFi in the U.S., risking the exodus of innovation to jurisdictions like Singapore. The proposal has stalled bipartisan negotiations, with Republicans suspending talks and accusing Democrats of bad-faith bargaining.
The regulatory uncertainty has had immediate market effects. Bitcoin dipped below $121,000 following news of the Senate stalemate, while Ethereum fell 3%. Industry leaders, including Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, warned that politicized regulation could undermine U.S. leadership in blockchain innovation. [1] Meanwhile, consumer advocates celebrated the impasse, arguing that rushed legislation risks repeating past failures like the FTX collapse. [1]
Looking ahead, analysts predict the Senate will not pass a comprehensive bill before 2026. In the interim, regulators will continue operating under existing laws, using enforcement actions to shape policy. Internationally, the U.S. faces stiff competition as the EU, Japan, and Singapore advance structured crypto frameworks. [1] The outcome of the House's pending vote on the IRS rule repeal and the Senate's ability to reconcile bipartisan and Democratic positions will determine whether the U.S. can maintain its position in the global crypto landscape. [2]



Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios