Qubic's Monero '51% attack' debunked, Dogecoin next target
PorAinvest
martes, 19 de agosto de 2025, 6:52 am ET1 min de lectura
DOGE--
According to Monero developers, the six-block reorganization that Qubic claimed as proof of a 51% attack was not conclusive. Luke Parker, lead developer at SeraiDEX, argued that such a reorganization merely indicated an adversary with high hash power had gotten lucky. This stance was supported by the fact that Qubic's hashrate was likely between 28-35%, not the 51% claimed [1].
The controversy has led Qubic's founder, Sergey Ivancheglo, to admit that the 51% attack should be rebranded as a 34% attack. This admission underscores the complexity and uncertainty surrounding the attack's success. The high cost and potential economic benefits of such an attack remain unclear, raising questions about the sustainability of Qubic's strategy.
Qubic's mechanism of selling mining profits to buy back tokens could collapse if hash power drops, potentially affecting the price of QUBIC tokens. This financial model relies on maintaining a significant hashrate to generate revenue, making it vulnerable to fluctuations in mining power.
The Monero community has been actively pushing back against Qubic's claims, with developers and cybersecurity experts expressing skepticism. The ongoing conflict highlights the challenges faced by proof-of-work networks when mining power becomes concentrated. Kraken, a major cryptocurrency exchange, has taken action by suspending Monero deposits, underscoring the potential risks to user security [2].
Looking ahead, Monero developers must decide how to address the risk of concentrated mining power. Options include promoting more decentralized mining, improving detection of manipulation, or altering consensus mechanisms in the long term. Meanwhile, Qubic's focus is shifting to Dogecoin, with the community voting to prioritize mining that coin. However, Dogecoin mining is not without its challenges, with intense competition and high costs potentially limiting Qubic's success [3].
The situation serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges in blockchain security. As Qubic continues to push its AI-driven strategy, Monero must strengthen its defenses to prevent future attacks. The episode also highlights the importance of decentralized mining and the need for robust security measures to protect cryptocurrency networks.
References:
[1] https://cointelegraph.com/news/monero-qubic-selfish-mining-51-percent-attack
[2] https://walletinvestor.com/magazine/kraken-suspends-monero-deposits-after-qubics-attack-raises-blockchain-alarm
[3] https://cryptoslate.com/dogecoins-2-daily-mining-profits-lure-qubic-after-monero-network-takeover/
Qubic's claims of a 51% attack on Monero's blockchain were exaggerated, with the actual hashrate controlled by their pool likely between 28-35%. The community is now targeting Dogecoin, with Qubic's founder admitting the 51% attack should be rebranded as a 34% attack. Qubic's mechanism of selling mining profits to buy back tokens could collapse if hash power drops, affecting QUBIC price.
In an unprecedented move, Qubic, an AI-focused crypto project, claimed to have successfully executed a 51% attack on Monero's blockchain, asserting control over more than half of the network's hashrate. However, recent developments suggest that the actual extent of Qubic's control was significantly overstated.According to Monero developers, the six-block reorganization that Qubic claimed as proof of a 51% attack was not conclusive. Luke Parker, lead developer at SeraiDEX, argued that such a reorganization merely indicated an adversary with high hash power had gotten lucky. This stance was supported by the fact that Qubic's hashrate was likely between 28-35%, not the 51% claimed [1].
The controversy has led Qubic's founder, Sergey Ivancheglo, to admit that the 51% attack should be rebranded as a 34% attack. This admission underscores the complexity and uncertainty surrounding the attack's success. The high cost and potential economic benefits of such an attack remain unclear, raising questions about the sustainability of Qubic's strategy.
Qubic's mechanism of selling mining profits to buy back tokens could collapse if hash power drops, potentially affecting the price of QUBIC tokens. This financial model relies on maintaining a significant hashrate to generate revenue, making it vulnerable to fluctuations in mining power.
The Monero community has been actively pushing back against Qubic's claims, with developers and cybersecurity experts expressing skepticism. The ongoing conflict highlights the challenges faced by proof-of-work networks when mining power becomes concentrated. Kraken, a major cryptocurrency exchange, has taken action by suspending Monero deposits, underscoring the potential risks to user security [2].
Looking ahead, Monero developers must decide how to address the risk of concentrated mining power. Options include promoting more decentralized mining, improving detection of manipulation, or altering consensus mechanisms in the long term. Meanwhile, Qubic's focus is shifting to Dogecoin, with the community voting to prioritize mining that coin. However, Dogecoin mining is not without its challenges, with intense competition and high costs potentially limiting Qubic's success [3].
The situation serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges in blockchain security. As Qubic continues to push its AI-driven strategy, Monero must strengthen its defenses to prevent future attacks. The episode also highlights the importance of decentralized mining and the need for robust security measures to protect cryptocurrency networks.
References:
[1] https://cointelegraph.com/news/monero-qubic-selfish-mining-51-percent-attack
[2] https://walletinvestor.com/magazine/kraken-suspends-monero-deposits-after-qubics-attack-raises-blockchain-alarm
[3] https://cryptoslate.com/dogecoins-2-daily-mining-profits-lure-qubic-after-monero-network-takeover/

Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema



Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios