La revisión estratégica de las tarifas por parte de Pump.fun y sus implicaciones para los ecosistemas de monedas memes basados en la liquidez

In the volatile world of meme coin ecosystems, aligning incentives between creators and traders has long been a thorny challenge. Pump.fun, a Solana-based platform that has become synonymous with the rise of tokenized internet culture, has recently unveiled a strategic fee overhaul designed to recalibrate this balance. By introducing dynamic fee structures, liquidity allocation mechanisms, and creator-driven incentives, Pump.fun aims to foster a self-sustaining ecosystem where both speculative activity and long-term value creation coexist. This analysis explores how these changes could redefine liquidity-driven meme coin dynamics and their broader implications for decentralized creator economies.

The Problem with Static Incentives

Prior to 2025, Pump.fun's fee model was criticized for disproportionately favoring low-risk token creation over trader participation. As noted in a report by , the previous system allocated equal 0.05% fees to the protocol and creators, while liquidity providers (LPs) received a mere 0.2% of total fees, for a combined 1.25% rate. This structure incentivized creators to prioritize rapid token minting over meaningful engagement, often leading to short-lived projects that collapsed after initial hype cycles. Traders, meanwhile, faced high slippage and limited rewards for providing liquidity, creating a misalignment that stifled sustainable growth.

Dynamic Fees and Project Ascend: A New Paradigm

Pump.fun's September 2025 overhaul, dubbed Project Ascend, introduced a tiered fee model that adjusts based on a token's market cap. According to CoinMonks, tokens with market caps below $300,000 now face a 0.95% fee, which decreases progressively to 0.05% for tokens exceeding $1 million in value.

This dynamic approach ensures that smaller projects retain higher fees to fund development, while larger tokens-driven by sustained trading activity-see reduced fees to attract liquidity. Crucially, the distribution of fees is now adaptive: creators receive a larger share as their tokens grow, while LPs benefit from lower fees and deeper pools at higher market caps.

This shift has already shown tangible results. According to , one week in late 2025 saw creators earn over $15.5 million in fees-surpassing Pump.fun's own revenue during the same period. Such outcomes suggest a healthier equilibrium where creators are rewarded for building projects with lasting appeal, rather than relying on fleeting virality.

Creator Fee Sharing: Empowering Community Governance

Complementing Project Ascend is the Creator Fee Sharing feature, which allows creators to distribute fees to up to 10 wallets, transfer coin ownership, and revoke update authority. This transparency tool addresses a key criticism of meme coin ecosystems: the lack of accountability and trust between creators and their audiences. By enabling traders to "vote with their wallets" through fee support, Pump.fun is fostering a more participatory model where narratives are backed by financial commitment rather than mere speculation.

The platform's native token, $PUMP, has responded positively to these changes. Following the announcements, its price surged approximately 10%, signaling renewed confidence in the platform's long-term viability. This price action underscores the market's recognition of Pump.fun's pivot toward creator-trader alignment.

Liquidity-Driven Growth and Ecosystem Expansion

The overhaul's emphasis on liquidity is particularly noteworthy. By reducing fees for high-market-cap tokens, Pump.fun is incentivizing traders to hold and trade larger positions, thereby deepening pools and reducing slippage. This creates a flywheel effect: lower fees attract more volume, which in turn generates higher creator earnings and protocol revenue.

Moreover, the platform's focus on "creator capital markets" has drawn traditional creators and influencers from outside crypto, expanding its user base beyond the Solana-native community. Viral projects like the Basedd House and Bagwork token demonstrated the platform's ability to generate massive short-term trading volumes, but also highlighted the need for long-term strategies to sustain value. Project Ascend's adaptive fee model appears to address this by rewarding projects that evolve beyond speculative stunts.

Risks and the Road Ahead

Despite these advancements, challenges remain. The meme coin space is inherently volatile, and Pump.fun's reliance on creator-driven narratives exposes it to the same hype cycles it seeks to mitigate. Additionally, the platform's success hinges on continued innovation-Alon, Pump.fun's co-founder, has hinted at further upgrades to the fee model in 2026 .

However, the strategic overhaul represents a critical step toward institutionalizing meme coin ecosystems. By aligning creator and trader incentives, Pump.fun is not only enhancing liquidity but also laying the groundwork for a more sustainable model of decentralized content funding. noted, this approach could redefine how internet culture is monetized, transforming viral trends into viable economic ecosystems.

Conclusion

Pump.fun's strategic fee overhaul marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of liquidity-driven meme coin platforms. By introducing dynamic fees, adaptive liquidity allocation, and community governance tools, the platform is addressing the structural imbalances that have plagued the space. While risks persist, the early results-record creator payouts, improved liquidity, and a 10% price surge in $PUMP-suggest that the model is resonating with both creators and traders. For investors, this represents an opportunity to engage with a platform that is not only capitalizing on the meme coin boom but also redefining its long-term potential.