Revisión de las tarifas de Pump.fun: Un cambio estratégico en los incentivos y las dinámicas de liquidez relacionadas con las monedas de memes.

The memecoin ecosystem has long been a paradox: a space defined by viral speculation yet increasingly reliant on structured incentives to sustain its frenetic energy. Pump.fun, the Solana-based launchpad dominating 75–80% of memecoin activity, has recently undertaken a seismic overhaul of its fee model, signaling a pivotal shift in how creator and trader incentives are balanced. This analysis examines whether the platform's recalibration-from a creator-centric model to one prioritizing trader-driven liquidity-can redefine long-term value capture in the memecoin economy or merely delay the inevitable collapse into another speculative cycle.

The Problem with Dynamic Fees V1: A Creator-Centric Imbalance

Pump.fun's initial Dynamic Fees V1 model, introduced in early 2025, tied creator fees to token market capitalization, offering lower fees for high-valuation tokens. While this spurred a 200% surge in bonding curve volumes, it created a structural imbalance: creators were incentivized to launch low-risk tokens with minimal effort, while traders-whose activity generates liquidity-were undercompensated. As co-founder Alon Cohen admitted, the system "failed to reward traders, whose participation is critical to the platform's health." This misalignment led to a flood of short-lived tokens, with 99% failing to graduate to external exchanges, and skewed the platform's value distribution toward deployers rather than market participants.

The New Fee-Sharing Model: Trader-Driven Liquidity and Transparency

The 2025 overhaul introduces a fee-sharing mechanism allowing creators to distribute fees across up to 10 wallets, enhancing transparency and reducing reliance on informal arrangements. This shift aims to align incentives with traders by enabling them to "vote with their wallets," determining which tokens deserve revenue-sharing privileges. For instance, the platform now allocates a 1% fee on all swap transactions, generating $882 million in 2025 and a monthly run-rate of $20–30 million. These funds are directed to a treasury holding $1.06 billion in reserves (primarily USDC and SOL), supporting buybacks and strategic expansion.

The changes also include governance tools like fee ownership transfer, addressing prior weaknesses in token management. By empowering traders to influence token narratives, Pump.fun hopes to foster higher-quality projects and sustainable liquidity provision. Early results suggest success: the platform's native token, $PUMP, surged 11% post-announcement, while weekly trading volumes hit $6.6 billion.

Sustainability or Speculation? The Long-Term Outlook

The key question remains: does this rebalancing create a sustainable model, or does it merely extend the speculative cycle? Critics argue that Pump.fun still favors deployers, as most tokens remain unprofitable beyond their launch phase. However, the platform's treasury and buyback programs- absorbing 18% of circulating $PUMP supply-signal a commitment to stabilizing its ecosystem.

From a Solana infrastructure perspective, Pump.fun's dominance drives transaction volume and liquidity, indirectly benefiting the chain's DeFi protocols. The platform's market-driven approach could also catalyze innovation in Creator Capital Markets (CCMs), enabling individuals to monetize speculative assets with minimal barriers. Yet, regulatory scrutiny looms large. U.S. and European authorities have already flagged the platform's speculative nature, raising concerns about compliance and long-term viability.

Implications for Investors in Solana-Based Protocols

For investors in Solana's token infrastructure and liquidity protocols, Pump.fun's overhaul presents a dual-edged opportunity. On one hand, the platform's success reinforces Solana's position as a high-throughput chain for DeFi, with declining transaction costs further enhancing its appeal. On the other, the inherent volatility of memecoins and the high failure rate of tokens pose risks. Liquidity protocols integrated with Pump.fun must balance exposure to its growth with safeguards against token depreciation.

Conclusion: A Step Forward, but Risks Remain

Pump.fun's fee overhaul represents a strategic pivot toward trader-driven liquidity and transparency, addressing critical flaws in its creator-centric model. By redistributing fees and empowering market participants, the platform aims to create a more sustainable ecosystem where value is captured through active trading rather than speculative deployment. However, the high failure rate of tokens, regulatory uncertainties, and the platform's reliance on viral narratives suggest that this is not a panacea. For investors, the key lies in hedging against volatility while capitalizing on Pump.fun's role in accelerating Solana's DeFi adoption.