Prologis Rises 0.06% on $300M Volume as Logistics REIT Ranks 386th in Market Activity Amid E-Commerce Surge and Rate Hikes

On October 6, 2025, Prologis (PLD) closed with a 0.06% gain, trading at a volume of $300 million, ranking 386th in market activity for the day. The logistics REIT’s performance reflected mixed market dynamics amid sector-specific developments and strategic investor positioning.

Recent activity highlighted Prologis’ resilience in a shifting industrial real estate landscape. Analysts noted that ongoing demand for last-mile distribution centers and e-commerce-driven warehouse expansion continued to underpin the company’s asset fundamentals. However, rising interest rates tempered near-term optimism, as financing costs for large-scale logistics projects increased. The stock’s muted move suggested a balance between sectoral tailwinds and macroeconomic headwinds.

Investor sentiment was further shaped by Prologis’ recent capital deployment strategy. The firm announced a revised focus on high-growth U.S. markets, reallocating resources from underperforming international assets. While this shift aims to enhance long-term returns, short-term volatility remains a risk as the market digests execution timelines and potential operational costs.

To ensure I back-test this strategy accurately, could you please help me clarify a few practical details? Universe: Which market should the “top 500 stocks by daily trading volume” be drawn from (e.g., all U.S. listed equities, only S&P 500 constituents, a specific exchange, etc.)? Trade price convention: Do you want to buy at that day’s close and sell at next day’s close, or buy at next day’s open and sell at next day’s close, or another convention? Weighting: Should each of the 500 selected stocks be held with equal dollar weight, or do you prefer a volume-, value-, or market-cap-weighted approach? Benchmark / performance metrics: Do you need a specific benchmark comparison (e.g., S&P 500), or is raw strategy return sufficient? Once I have these details, I can determine whether the current back-testing framework can implement your cross-sectional, multi-stock strategy directly or whether we need to approximate or simplify it.