Pony Stock Surges 10.94% on $280M Trading Volume Ranks 406th in Market Activity
. 15, , . The stock’s performance reflects renewed investor attention amid strategic developments and market positioning shifts.
Recent updates highlight Pony’s expansion into autonomous mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) partnerships, with two undisclosed regional agreements finalized to deploy its robotaxi fleet in mid-2025. The company also announced a technical collaboration with a European automotive supplier to integrate advanced sensor fusion systems, . These moves align with Pony’s Q3 2025 roadmap to scale operations beyond Tier-1 Chinese cities.
Analysts note that Pony’s stock trajectory remains tied to its ability to secure regulatory approvals for cross-border operations and demonstrate scalable profitability. While the company has yet to turn a profit, , signaling potential efficiency gains. Short-term volatility may persist as the market digests mixed signals between its technological progress and near-term revenue challenges.
To run this back-test accurately I need a few extra details and a small clarification about scope: 1. UniverseUPC-- • Do you want to use all U.S.–listed common stocks (NYSE + NASDAQ + NYSE Arca) or another market/universe? 2. Trade mechanicsMCHB-- • Rebalancing frequency: “hold 1 day” — should the portfolio be formed at TODAY’s close and liquidated at TOMORROW’s close (close-to-close P&L), or open-to-open, or some other convention? • Position sizing: equal-weight across the 500 names each day? • Transaction costs/slippage: ignore, or apply specific costs? 3. Practical note on tooling Our current single-ticker back-testing engine is best suited to one security at a time. A daily cross-sectional “top-500” strategy involves thousands of trades per day. I can either: a) Construct a custom script (outside the built-in engine) to approximate the portfolio-level return; or b) Narrow the request (e.g., compare a high-volume ETF or an index proxy). Let me know which universe and assumptions you prefer, and I’ll proceed with the most suitable approach.


Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios