Por qué la reducción de la cuota de participación de Polestar no logró salvar sus acciones - y qué significa esto para los inversores de vehículos eléctricos

In late 2025, Polestar executed a 1-for-30 to avoid delisting from Nasdaq, a move designed to elevate its share price above the exchange's $1 minimum bid requirement. While the structural adjustment succeeded in meeting regulatory thresholds, it failed to reverse the company's broader financial and market challenges. Polestar's stock shortly after the split, . This case study underscores the limitations of financial engineering in addressing systemic issues within a struggling electric vehicle (EV) company and highlights critical lessons for investors navigating the volatile EV sector.

The Mechanics of the Reverse Split and Immediate Market Reaction

Polestar's reverse stock split, effective December 9, 2025, consolidated 30 ADSs into one, theoretically tripling the share price. The move was a last-ditch effort to comply with Nasdaq's listing rules after the stock had fallen below the $1 threshold according to Nasdaq's requirements. However, the market's reaction was indifferent at best. Shares of trading post-split, with investors seemingly unimpressed by the cosmetic change. This outcome reflects a broader skepticism: reverse splits are often viewed as signals of desperation rather than solutions to underlying business problems.

Financial Engineering Limitations: A Band-Aid on a Bleeding Wound

are typically employed to delay delisting, but they do not address the root causes of a company's decline. Polestar's financials reveal a business grappling with existential challenges. For the first nine months of 2025, the company , . , driven by higher-priced models like the Polestar 3 and 4, the company's cash position remains under strain, .

Management has explicitly cast doubt on Polestar's ability to continue as a going concern, citing uncertainty over securing financing and adhering to debt covenants. This lack of confidence permeated investor sentiment, with shares to the reverse split as concerns over profitability and financial stability intensified. The reverse split, while technically effective in preserving the Nasdaq listing, did little to alleviate these deeper issues.

EV Sector Fundamentals: A Perfect Storm of Challenges

Polestar's struggles are emblematic of broader headwinds facing the EV sector. The industry is locked in a brutal pricing war, with companies like Tesla and BYD undercutting margins to capture market share. exacerbated by U.S. tariffs, costs, and production inefficiencies. These pressures are not unique to Polestar but are amplified by its niche positioning and reliance on high-cost manufacturing.

External factors further complicate the outlook. U.S. tariffs on Chinese EVs and geopolitical tensions have disrupted supply chains, while shifting consumer preferences toward more affordable models have eroded the appeal of premium EVs like Polestar's. The company's strategic pivot to expand its U.S. dealer network and shift production to North America is a step in the right direction, but these moves require significant capital and time to bear fruit according to industry analysis.

Implications for EV Investors: Beyond the Share Price

Polestar's reverse stock split serves as a cautionary tale for investors. While tools like reverse splits can temporarily stave off delisting, they cannot mask deteriorating fundamentals. For EV investors, the key takeaway is to scrutinize a company's ability to generate sustainable cash flows, manage debt, and adapt to sector-wide disruptions. Polestar's experience highlights the risks of investing in companies that rely on structural fixes rather than substantive operational improvements.

Moreover, the case underscores the importance of evaluating and competitive dynamics. The EV sector's transition from hype to profitability is far from complete, and companies that fail to innovate or control costs will likely face similar fates. Investors must differentiate between firms with scalable business models and those clinging to short-term fixes like reverse splits.

Conclusion

Polestar's reverse stock split was a necessary but insufficient measure to avoid delisting. The company's financial engineering efforts failed to address its core challenges: unsustainable losses, heavy debt, and a competitive landscape that rewards scale and efficiency. For EV investors, this episode reinforces the need to look beyond share price manipulations and focus on a company's ability to navigate sector-wide headwinds through innovation, cost discipline, and strategic agility. As the EV market matures, only those firms that can deliver both technological and financial resilience will survive.