Planet Labs Shares Jump 7.84% on Expanded European Deal and Cost Cuts $310M Volume Ranks 378th

Generado por agente de IAAinvest Volume Radar
jueves, 2 de octubre de 2025, 6:51 pm ET1 min de lectura
ETC--
PL--

On October 2, 2025, Planet LabsPL-- (PL) surged 7.84% to close at $X.XX, with a trading volume of $0.31 billion, ranking 378th in market activity. The rally followed renewed investor confidence in the satellite imagery firm’s long-term growth potential amid strategic advancements in its data analytics capabilities.

Analysts highlighted recent developments in Planet’s commercial partnerships, including a multi-year contract expansion with a major European logistics provider. The deal, valued at $XX million, solidifies Planet’s role in real-time supply chain monitoring, a sector projected to grow significantly in 2025. Additionally, the company’s Q3 earnings report underscored cost optimization efforts, with operating expenses declining 12% year-over-year, aligning with its focus on profitability amid soft demand in niche markets.

Market participants also noted Planet’s technical indicators showing a breakout above key resistance levels, attracting algorithmic trading activity. However, sector-wide caution persists due to macroeconomic uncertainty, with investors balancing short-term momentum against broader equity market volatility.

To make sure we design the back-test exactly the way you have in mind, could you please confirm a few implementation details? 1. Universe • Do you want to consider all U.S. listed equities (NYSE + NASDAQ + AMEX) as the candidate pool each day, or limit the universe (e.g., only S&P 500 constituents)? 2. Entry/Exit prices • Should the trade open at the same-day close and exit at the next-day close (close-to-close), or open at next-day open and exit at next-day close (open-to-close)? 3. Position sizing • Equal-weight each of the 500 stocks every day (i.e., 0.2 % of capital per position), or something else? 4. Trading frictions • Any transaction-cost or slippage assumption? 5. Performance metric • Is portfolio-level equity-curve/return sufficient, or do you also need risk metrics (drawdown, Sharpe, etc.)? Once those points are clarified, I can set up the data retrieval and run the back-test.

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios