Pirelli's US Ambitions Stalled by Sinochem's Stake

Pirelli, the storied Italian tire manufacturer, finds itself in a precarious position as it navigates the complexities of the U.S. market. The company, known for its high-performance tires and its role as the exclusive supplier for Formula 1, is facing significant hurdles due to its largest shareholder, China's state-owned Sinochem, which holds a 37% stake. This ownership structure is proving to be a double-edged sword, particularly as Washington tightens its grip on Chinese technology in the automotive industry.

Marco Tronchetti Provera, Pirelli's executive vice chairman, has openly discussed the challenges posed by Sinochem's stake. In an interview with Italian daily la Repubblica, he revealed that Sinochem's significant holding has been a "hurdle" in negotiations with local authorities in states like Alabama and Virginia. The situation is further complicated by new U.S. laws that ban key software and hardware from Chinese-controlled companies in connected or autonomous vehicles, set to take effect in 2027 and 2029.



The U.S. market is crucial for Pirelli, accounting for 25% of its revenue. However, the company's ability to expand and operate freely in this market is now under threat. Pirelli's tires, embedded with data-collecting technology, risk non-compliance with U.S. regulations if Sinochem's stake is deemed too influential. This technological integration, while innovative, is now a liability in the face of U.S. regulatory scrutiny.

Pirelli is exploring several options to mitigate these challenges. One scenario involves reducing Sinochem's stake from 37% to 25%, freeing up a 12% block for reallocation to other investors. This would dilute Sinochem's influence and align with U.S. regulatory requirements. Alternatively, Pirelli could pursue a governance revision to further limit Chinese influence beyond the measures implemented by the Italian government using the so-called golden power in 2023.

The Italian government's intervention under "golden power" regulations has already granted local shareholders the authority to appoint the CEO and veto strategic decisions. However, unresolved disputes persist, risking the approval of Pirelli's 2024 financial results. The company's board meeting, originally scheduled for April 28, 2025, has been postponed to address these governance reforms.

The situation underscores the broader tensions between Chinese investment and Western regulatory frameworks. Pirelli's case is a microcosm of the challenges faced by companies operating in a globalized economy, where national security concerns and technological advancements collide. The company's ability to navigate these complexities will determine its future in the U.S. market and beyond.

In conclusion, Pirelli's U.S. ambitions are hindered by Sinochem's significant stake, creating a governance crisis that threatens the company's operational flexibility and strategic decisions. The path forward requires a delicate balance of shareholder negotiations, regulatory compliance, and strategic restructuring. Only time will tell if Pirelli can successfully navigate these challenges and maintain its competitive edge in the global tire market.