Petco's Q2 2026: Contradictions Emerge on Gross Margins, Store vs. E-commerce Focus, North Star Pillars, and Pricing Strategy

Generado por agente de IAAinvest Earnings Call Digest
jueves, 28 de agosto de 2025, 8:33 pm ET3 min de lectura

The above is the analysis of the conflicting points in this earnings call

Date of Call: None provided

Financials Results

  • Revenue: Net sales down 2.3% YOY; comparable sales down 1.4%; two-year comp improved 130 bps sequentially (Q2 vs Q1).
  • Gross Margin: 39.3%, up more than 120 bps YOY; minimal tariff impact in Q2; both products and services margins expanded.

Guidance:

  • FY25 adjusted EBITDA outlook raised to $385M–$395M (~+16% vs prior outlook midpoint).
  • FY25 net sales expected down low single digits YOY (includes store closures).
  • Tariff headwinds to be meaningful in Q3 and most significant in Q4.
  • Q3 adjusted EBITDA expected at $92M–$94M (~+15% YOY midpoint); Q3 net sales down low single digits; seasonally below Q2.
  • FY25 depreciation ~$200M; net interest expense ~$130M.
  • ~25 net store closures in FY25; capex ~$125M–$130M with ROIC focus.

Business Commentary:

  • Financial Performance and Profitability Improvements:
  • Petco reported increased operating income by over $40 million and generated more than $50 million in free cash flow in Q2.
  • The company delivered $114 million in adjusted EBITDA for the quarter.
  • The improvements were driven by a focus on operational excellence, inventory management, and strategic pricing decisions.

  • Gross Margin Expansion:

  • Petco achieved a gross margin expansion of over 120 basis points to 39.3% compared to the previous year.
  • This was achieved through a more disciplined approach to average unit cost and average unit retail, along with improved pricing and promotional strategies.

  • E-commerce and Digital Strategy:

  • Petco is focused on enhancing its omnichannel experience, with a new leader for the e-commerce channel identified to drive improvements.
  • The company aims to increase marketing efforts to invite new customers back to Petco.com, acknowledging the need to improve e-commerce performance.

  • North Star Project and Customer Engagement:

  • The North Star project aimed to reimagine key elements of Petco, including merchandising, services, and marketing.
  • Initiatives such as reintroducing the "Where the Pets Go" tagline and hosting in-store events have improved customer engagement and satisfaction, as evidenced by increased NPS scores.

Sentiment Analysis:

  • Management raised FY25 EBITDA guidance and delivered Q2 adjusted EBITDA of $114M (+$30M YOY; margin to 7.6% with ~220 bps expansion). Gross margin expanded >120 bps to 39.3%. Operating profit rose $41M to $43M and free cash flow exceeded $50M. While net sales fell 2.3% and tariffs will weigh more in H2, leaders emphasized disciplined pricing/promo, SG&A leverage, and progress in store fundamentals, supporting continued bottom-line improvement.

Q&A:

  • Question from Michael Lasser (UBS): When should investors expect a return to positive comp—Q4 this year or 2026?
    Response: Positive comp is more likely in 2026; company remains in Phase 2 with Q3 the toughest compare.
  • Question from Michael Lasser (UBS): Were gross margin gains mainly from online promo cleanup, and would stores be positive ex-ecomm?
    Response: Cleanup was heavier in e-commerce; stores were the focus and are improving, but store-only comp not quantified.
  • Question from Steven Zaccone (Citi): Gross margin beat and tariff timing—how did it compare to expectations and what’s the back-half impact?
    Response: Gross margin expanded via AUR/AUC, pricing/promo discipline across products and services; tariffs were minimal in Q2, meaningful in Q3, and most significant in Q4.
  • Question from Steven Zaccone (Citi): How are you using pricing in the back half?
    Response: Pricing actions continue with a consumer-first lens; approach has been in place all year and will persist into H2.
  • Question from Jake Neibosh (Guggenheim): Update on planogram resets?
    Response: Dog/cat resets are complete, boosting on-shelf availability, labor productivity, and store profitability; more category resets are coming.
  • Question from Jake Neibosh (Guggenheim): Any details on the North Star initiative?
    Response: Four pillars: elevate store experience, scale services, drive merchandising differentiation, and win in omnichannel.
  • Question from Kamal Gajawala (Jefferies): Status of e-commerce pullback/retool and inventory levels?
    Response: E-comm is more profitable with a new leader fixing basics (speed, repeat delivery, scheduling); inventory down 9.5% YOY with better in-stocks; tight, well-governed buys.
  • Question from Kamal Gajawala (Jefferies): What’s driving the NPS improvement?
    Response: Improved in-store experience from partner engagement and leadership focus is resonating with customers.
  • Question from Kendall Toscano (Bank of America): What were transactions vs AUR trends?
    Response: Basket and UPT were healthy; transactions lagged and are the key focus, with events/marketing to drive traffic.
  • Question from Kendall Toscano (Bank of America): Biggest remaining execution gaps before fully shifting to Phase 3?
    Response: Focus is shifting to reinvestment; margin runway remains via sourcing, pharmacy expansion, and rebuilding supplies.
  • Question from Simeon Gutman (Morgan Stanley): Trends in pet families and customer behavior?
    Response: Category is roughly flat; Petco is holding share while prioritizing profit; shifting from bottom-funnel e-comm to LTV/omni and cross-selling services customers.
  • Question from Simeon Gutman (Morgan Stanley): Any markdown risk from merchandise changes?
    Response: No significant risk expected; inventory governance is tight with fast-turn, seasonal, well-controlled buys.
  • Question from Justin Kleber (Baird): Can you size the comp drag from promo cleanup and what is the underlying run-rate?
    Response: Too granular to quantify; Q3 is the hardest compare; stores are improving while e-comm cleanup continues.
  • Question from Justin Kleber (Baird): Why does implied Q4 adjusted EBITDA step down?
    Response: Q4 faces the largest tariff headwinds; management is reserving funds for targeted investments and guarding against macro volatility.

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios