¿Es la reciente alza de un 25% de PEPE un despegue legítimo o una manipulación del juego de los cetáceos?

Generado por agente de IA12X ValeriaRevisado porDavid Feng
viernes, 2 de enero de 2026, 4:31 am ET2 min de lectura

The recent 25% price surge in

has sparked debate among investors and analysts about its legitimacy. While some view it as a sign of renewed bullish momentum, others argue that on-chain and technical indicators point to a bearish narrative driven by whale activity and pattern formations. This analysis evaluates the sustainability of the rally through volume dynamics, OBV trends, RSI momentum, whale behavior, and classical chart patterns to determine whether the move is organic or a coordinated manipulation play.

Technical Indicators: Bearish Divergence and Pattern Risks

PEPE's technical profile in December 2025 reveals a critical bearish head-and-shoulders pattern, with a peak (head) forming in late November 2024 and lower highs (shoulders) signaling weakening momentum. The neckline, oscillating between $0.00000521 and $0.00000060, acts as a pivotal support level. A breakdown below this threshold could trigger a 70% decline,

.

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) further corroborates this bearish outlook. Price action has shown bearish divergence, with lower highs in price accompanied by higher highs in RSI-a classic sign of waning buying pressure and a potential continuation of the downtrend

. Meanwhile, On-Balance Volume (OBV) trends during the 25% rally have been underwhelming. While price surged, , suggesting the rally lacked robust volume-driven conviction. This divergence between price and volume raises questions about the legitimacy of the uptick, as genuine breakouts typically see synchronized increases in both metrics.

On-Chain Whale Activity: Accumulation vs. Capitulation

Whale behavior in December 2025 has been a double-edged sword. On one hand, large investors have

, signaling capitulation and increased sell-side pressure. On the other, , raising concerns about concentrated manipulation. Santiment data also in holdings for wallets with 100 million to 1 billion PEPE tokens, indicating a strategic exit by top holders.

Notably,

, suggesting long-term strategic interest. However, this contrasts with broader market trends: exchange reserves have fallen by 0.9 trillion PEPE, but also a shift of tokens into cold storage. The mixed signals-accumulation in October 2025 (4.28% growth for top 100 addresses) versus December's offloading- in whale intentions.

Volume Dynamics and Manipulation Risks

Trading volume

as PEPE tested critical support levels, a metric often associated with either strong demand or panic selling. While this surge could indicate a potential reversal, the lack of corresponding OBV growth weakens its bullish case. Additionally, : a whale previously manipulated tokens to earn $80 million, underscoring the risks of concentrated control in speculative assets like PEPE.

Derivatives data also paints a bearish picture. CoinGlass reports a negative funding rate of -0.0052% and rising open interest, suggesting traders are betting on further declines despite short-term volatility. This aligns with the broader bearish sentiment observed in on-chain whale behavior.

Conclusion: A Bearish Setup with High Correction Risks

While the 25% rally may appear enticing, the technical and on-chain evidence overwhelmingly favors a bearish narrative. The head-and-shoulders pattern, bearish RSI divergence, and weak OBV trends all point to a fragile uptrend. Whale activity-marked by both capitulation and concentrated holdings-further complicates the outlook, with manipulation risks amplified by historical precedents.

Investors should closely monitor the neckline break and whale movements. A breakdown below $0.00000060 could accelerate the selloff, while sustained accumulation by large holders might hint at a potential bottom. However, given the current data, the rally appears more aligned with a whales' manipulation play than a legitimate breakout. Caution is warranted, and position sizing should reflect the elevated risk of a deeper correction.

author avatar
12X Valeria

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios