Súper incremento al 150 % de Palantir en 2025: ¿La acción de IA se dirige a una corrección del 79 %?

The year 2025 has been nothing short of extraordinary for Palantir Technologies (PLTR), whose stock surged 150% amid a frenzy of optimism surrounding its AI-driven platforms and commercial expansion. However, as the company's valuation balloons to stratospheric levels-marked by a trailing P/E ratio of 448x and an EV/EBITDA of 494x-investors are increasingly asking whether this momentum is sustainable or if a sharp correction looms on the horizon. This analysis examines Palantir's financial performance, valuation metrics, and historical parallels to determine the plausibility of a 79% decline.

Financial Performance: Growth vs. Valuation

Palantir's Q3 2025 results underscored its rapid ascent. U.S. commercial revenue surged 121% year-over-year to $397 million, driven by large-scale deals exceeding $1 million and $10 million thresholds. The company's gross margin of 80.81% and profit margin of 28.11% highlight operational efficiency, while its core products-AIP, Foundry, and Gotham-are increasingly embedded in enterprise and government workflows.

Yet these metrics mask a critical issue: Palantir's valuation is decoupling from traditional financial logic. Its trailing P/E ratio of 442.81 far exceeds its 5-year average of 284.68, and its forward P/E of 190x in bullish scenarios suggests markets are pricing in decades of unbroken growth. Such multiples are typical of speculative bubbles, where investors prioritize future potential over current earnings.

Valuation Metrics: A Dot-Com Echo?

Palantir's valuation bears unsettling similarities to the 2000 dot-com crash. During that era, companies were valued on user growth and "eyeballs," not profits. Today, AI firms are similarly priced on abstract metrics like "tokens processed" and "model queries," with little regard for profitability according to analysis. Palantir's government contracts, which account for 54% of revenue, further complicate its valuation, as they are politically sensitive and subject to regulatory shifts.

Historical precedents reinforce these concerns. A report by MIT found that 95% of generative AI pilots fail to generate measurable returns, echoing the dot-com era's overhyped ventures. Meanwhile, Palantir's November 2025 stock drop-its worst month in two years-mirrored the volatility seen in 2020–2022 tech sell-offs, where AI-linked stocks like Upstart Holdings fell 86% from their peaks.

Market Risks and Catalysts for a Correction

Several factors could trigger a 79% correction in Palantir's stock. First, its reliance on government contracts exposes it to geopolitical risks. A shift in U.S. policy or budget constraints could erode a significant portion of its revenue base. Second, the AI sector's speculative nature is underpinned by weak fundamentals. As noted by Forbes, the current AI boom may see a "shakeout" as weaker players consolidate or collapse.

Macro trends also weigh on the stock. High inflation and interest rates have historically pressured high-valuation tech stocks, with AI-linked firms like Oracle and AMD recently falling 4–8% due to stalled deals and financing concerns. Palantir's forward P/E of 190x implies investors expect earnings of nearly $5.00 by 2030 under a 50% annual growth assumption, a trajectory that appears increasingly optimistic given the sector's volatility.

Conclusion: A Cautionary Outlook

While Palantir's commercial expansion and AI infrastructure initiatives position it as a key player in the AI ecosystem, its valuation remains precarious. Historical patterns-from the dot-com crash to recent AI corrections-suggest that markets often overcorrect when speculative fervor outpaces fundamentals. A 79% decline, though extreme, is not implausible if earnings fail to meet lofty expectations or macroeconomic conditions deteriorate.

Investors must weigh Palantir's transformative potential against the risks of overvaluation. For now, the stock appears to be trading more like a speculative bet than a mature enterprise. As one analyst aptly noted, "The AI boom feels eerily similar to 2000's dotcom crash-with some important differences" according to analysis. Whether those differences prove sufficient to justify the valuation remains to be seen.