Ocean Power shares surge 26.84% intraday after securing US Homeland Security multi-buoy contract.

think> Okay, let's tackle this query. The user wants me to transform a given text into a concise news headline following specific rules. Let me start by understanding the requirements. First, the company name is "Ocean Power". I need to keep that unchanged. The percentage change is 26.84448268%, which I have to round to two decimal places. Rounding that gives 26.84%, and since there are no trailing zeros, that's fine. Next, the time period is "intraday", so I need to include that in the headline. The reason for the price movement is listed as three points. The user's example included the key reasons in the first paragraph, so I should do the same here. Looking at the reasons: the first one is about Leidos acquiring ENTRUST for $2.4 billion to expand their energy infrastructure. The second is the North Sea Summit's investment agreement aiming for 300 GW by 2050. The third is Ocean Power Technologies getting a multi-buoy contract from the US Department of Homeland Security. I need to briefly mention these reasons. The example combined the subsidiary's project into the main reason. Here, the three points are separate events, but the stock is Ocean Power, so the third point directly relates to them. The first two might be more about the industry context. However, the user's example included the subsidiary's action as the main reason. So maybe I should focus on the direct reason related to Ocean Power. Wait, the third point is about Ocean Power getting a contract. That's a direct reason for their stock movement. The first two are more about the industry or other companies. So the main reason should be the contract from the US Department of Homeland Security. The other two points might be supporting factors but not the direct cause. However, the user's example included the subsidiary's project as the main reason. Let me check the example again. In the example, the main reason was the subsidiary's project. Here, the third point is the company's own contract. So that's the direct reason. The other two are probably mentioned to provide context but not the primary cause. However, the user's example included the subsidiary's action even though there were other factors. So perhaps I should include all three points as the reasons, but keep it concise. Wait, the user's example had two sentences in the reason part. Let me check the example's output again. The first part was the subsidiary's project, and the second part was the company's focus. So maybe in this case, the first two points are about the industry context, and the third is the direct reason. But the user's example included the subsidiary's action as the main reason. So perhaps here, the third point is the direct reason, and the first two are supporting factors. But how to present that concisely. The user's instruction says to provide a brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information. So I need to mention the three reasons but keep it brief. However, the example only included the subsidiary's project and the company's focus. So maybe here, the key reason is the contract with the US Department of Homeland Security, and the other two points can be mentioned as additional factors. But the user's example included the subsidiary's action as the main reason. Let me structure it similarly. The first sentence in the example was the surge and the reason. Then additional details. So here, the headline should start with Ocean Power's surge, followed by the reasons. The first reason is the Leidos acquisition, the second the North Sea Summit, and the third the contract. But the contract is the most direct reason. However, the user's example included the subsidiary's action even though there were other factors. So perhaps the main reason is the contract, and the other two are supporting. But how to present that concisely. Alternatively, maybe all three are considered contributing factors. The example included the subsidiary's project as the main reason. Here, the third point is the company's own contract, so that's the direct reason. The first two points are about the industry and other companies, which might be part of the broader context. So the headline should mention the contract as the main reason, and perhaps mention the other two as additional factors. But the user's example didn't include multiple reasons beyond the subsidiary's action. Hmm. Wait, the example's output had two paragraphs. The first paragraph included the surge and the subsidiary's project. The second paragraph was about the company's focus. So maybe in this case, the first paragraph should mention the surge and the direct reason (the contract), and the second paragraph can include the other two points as additional context. But the user's instruction says to provide a brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information. So the key reason is the contract. The other two are additional factors. So the headline should start with Ocean Power surging 26.84.