Norfolk Southern Slides 0.17% with $590M Volume Ranking 207th in U.S. Equities

Norfolk Southern (NSC) closed lower by 0.17% on October 6, 2025, with a trading volume of $590 million, ranking it 207th among U.S. equities by volume. The decline followed a strategic partnership announcement with a logistics technology firm to enhance rail network efficiency, though details on implementation timelines remain undisclosed. Market participants noted mixed sentiment as the deal’s short-term cost implications for capital expenditures offset long-term operational improvement expectations.

Analysts highlighted that the stock’s muted performance aligned with broader sector trends, where railroad operators faced earnings volatility due to seasonal cargo shipment fluctuations. The partnership, while signaling competitive positioning in automation, did not trigger immediate trading algorithm activity, as reflected in the stock’s narrow intraday range. Institutional holdings data showed no significant new positions in the last quarter, suggesting limited catalysts for near-term momentum shifts.

To run an accurate test I need to clarify a couple of points: 1. Universe • Do you want all U.S.-listed common stocks (≈4 000 names) ranked each day, or a narrower universe such as S&P 500 constituents? • ADRs, ETFs and preferred shares are typically excluded—keep that convention? 2. Weighting and execution • Should we assume an equal-weight allocation across the 500 names each day (the usual approach) and ignore transaction costs/slippage? • Trades executed at the closing price on day t and exited at the closing price on day t+1 — is that acceptable? 3. Benchmark / output • Any specific benchmark you’d like the strategy compared against (e.g., SPY, equal-weight universe, etc.)? Once I have those details I can set up the data pulls and run the back-test.