Navitas shares surge 14.96% after-hours as strategic shift to AI data centers and NVIDIA 800V transition gains investor confidence.

think> Okay, let's tackle this query step by step. The user wants me to act as a financial analyst explaining a stock's price movement based on recent news. The stock in question is Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS), which saw a 14.96% increase after hours. First, I need to check the input data. The stock performance is given as a significant after-hour gain. The recent news events are listed as Reason 1 through Reason 6. My task is to determine which of these news events are relevant and caused the stock movement. Looking at Reason 1: The article mentions that Navitas is shifting away from low-margin consumer chips to AI data centers and mentions NVIDIA's 800V transition. This is a strategic move that could boost the stock. The date here is Jan 21, 2026, which is after the trading period mentioned (after-hour on Jan 22, 2026?), but maybe there's a typo. Wait, the user input says the stock performance is after-hour on a certain date, but the news event is published on Jan 21. So the news is recent enough to affect the after-hour trading. Reason 2 seems to be a placeholder with an error message, so probably not relevant. Reason 3 talks about the stock surging 7.13% mid-day on Jan 22, but the user's input is about an after-hour move. This might be a different event, but the user's focus is on the after-hour increase. However, maybe the mid-day surge is part of the same trend. But the user's instruction is to link the after-hour movement to the news. The after-hour movement is 14.96%, which is higher than the mid-day 7.13%, so maybe the mid-day surge is part of the same day's trading, but the after-hour movement is a separate event. However, the user's input might have conflicting dates. The user's input says the stock performance is after-hour, and the news events include a mid-day surge. But the key here is to see if any of the news events directly caused the after-hour movement. Reason 4 is another article from Intellectia.AI, published recently, talking about the strategic shift to AI data centers and potential for NVIDIA's 800V transition. This aligns with Reason 1. The author is Emily J. Thompson, a CFA, which adds credibility. Reason 5 is in Spanish and has no content, so irrelevant. Reason 6 is in German and discusses the stock's volatility due to AI power chips and trade policies. It mentions the impact of NVIDIA partnerships and trade policies, which could be relevant. The article also notes the speculative short-sale potential and engagement in power supply chips for AI data centers. However, the German article also mentions the stock's sensitivity to changing trade policies between the US and EU, which might be a bearish factor, but the overall tone seems to highlight the AI focus as a positive. Now, the stock moved up by 14.96% after hours. The key news events that are relevant would be the strategic shift to AI data centers and the potential with NVIDIA's 800V transition. Reasons 1, 4, and 6 all touch on this. The other reasons either don't provide relevant info or are about different timeframes. The after-hour movement is likely driven by the strategic shift and the potential in AI data centers, especially given NVIDIA's influence. The analyst reports in Reason 4 and 6 also mention the positive outlook from the shift, even though some analysts have downgraded, the overall narrative is about the company's pivot to higher-margin AI applications. I need to make sure that the news events are the cause of the after-hour movement. The after-hour movement happened on a specific date, and the news events published on Jan 21 and Jan 22 would be the most recent. The key point is the strategic shift and the focus on AI data centers, which are covered in Reasons 1 and 4. The German article (Reason 6) also mentions the AI power chip engagement, which aligns with the positive movement. The other reasons, like the Motley Fool article (Reason 1) which says not to buy the stock, might have a negative effect, but the stock still went up. However, the main positive factors (AI shift and NVIDIA partnership) seem to outweigh the negative analyst opinions. So the concise summary should mention the after-hour surge, the strategic shift to AI data centers, and the potential with NVIDIA's 800V transition. The answer should be under 150 words, using the correct formatting, and avoid markdown. The example provided by the user uses the company name, the percentage, the trading session, and the key news. So following that structure, the answer should be something like: Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) surged.