Navigating the Shift from SEO to Generative Engine Optimization
PorAinvest
lunes, 4 de agosto de 2025, 8:56 pm ET2 min de lectura
MSFT--
The advent of conversational AI chatbots like ChatGPT is significantly altering the landscape of online discovery and content consumption. As these AI tools become more prevalent, search engine optimization (SEO) is evolving into generative engine optimization (GEO). GEO focuses on creating "citable chunks" that answer common questions and establish expertise through high-quality content and backlinks. This shift is forcing media companies to adapt their strategies to remain relevant and profitable.
Generative AI tools are reducing traffic to news websites by providing direct summaries, threatening media revenue models, and forcing publishers to adapt or risk obsolescence [1]. A recent Pew Research Center study revealed that when AI-generated summaries appear in Google searches, users are 50% less likely to click through to source articles. This trend represents a devastating loss of visitors for online media sites that depend on traffic for both advertising revenue and subscription conversions.
To survive this shift, media companies are increasingly adopting Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). GEO involves providing AI models with clearly labeled content, good structure, and comprehensible text, as well as maintaining a strong presence on social networks and forums that are crawled by AI companies [3]. This strategy aims to ensure that AI-generated content remains accurate and valuable, thereby maintaining traffic to the original source.
Publishers face a critical decision regarding AI crawlers. Should they allow OpenAI crawlers to crawl their websites, potentially exposing their content to AI summarization? Some publishers have chosen to block AI crawlers to protect their content, while others are reopening access to avoid obscurity [1]. This dilemma highlights the complex relationship between publishers and AI tools.
The issue of fair compensation for content use remains contentious. While some publishers argue that companies using their content are paying fair market value, legal battles continue to shape the landscape. For instance, the New York Times has sued OpenAI and Microsoft over the use of its content [2]. These legal disputes underscore the need for clear guidelines and compensation models for AI-generated content.
The Reuters Institute's 2025 Digital News Report indicates that about 15% of people under 25 now use generative AI to get their news [4]. This trend raises concerns about information credibility and the future of original reporting. Without original journalism, AI platforms would have nothing to summarize. As Matt Karolian, vice president of research and development at Boston Globe Media, warns, "The next three or four years will be incredibly challenging for publishers everywhere" [2].
While the immediate future looks challenging for the media industry, some experts believe that AI platforms will eventually recognize their dependence on quality journalism. John Wihbey, a professor at Northeastern University, predicts that "the platforms will realize how much they need the press" [1]. Google's development of partnerships with news organizations to feed its generative AI features suggests potential paths forward, but whether this realization comes soon enough to save struggling newsrooms remains an open question.
In conclusion, the shift from SEO to GEO is a significant challenge for the media industry. Media companies must adapt their strategies to focus on maintaining content quality rather than tactics. The future of the media industry will depend on how effectively publishers can navigate this transition and ensure the sustainability of original journalism.
References:
[1] https://theoutpost.ai/news-story/ai-powered-search-threatens-media-industry-s-survival-18586/
[2] https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/718377/seo-geo-chatgpt-search-google
Search engine optimization (SEO) is shifting to generative engine optimization (GEO) as conversational AI chatbots dominate online discovery. GEO focuses on "citable chunks" that answer common questions and establish expertise through high-quality content and backlinks. Listicles, comparison tables, rankings, recommendations, and original research can attract AI linkage. However, referral traffic is declining, and the focus should be on maintaining content quality rather than tactics.
Title: The Shift from SEO to GEO: Implications for the Media IndustryThe advent of conversational AI chatbots like ChatGPT is significantly altering the landscape of online discovery and content consumption. As these AI tools become more prevalent, search engine optimization (SEO) is evolving into generative engine optimization (GEO). GEO focuses on creating "citable chunks" that answer common questions and establish expertise through high-quality content and backlinks. This shift is forcing media companies to adapt their strategies to remain relevant and profitable.
Generative AI tools are reducing traffic to news websites by providing direct summaries, threatening media revenue models, and forcing publishers to adapt or risk obsolescence [1]. A recent Pew Research Center study revealed that when AI-generated summaries appear in Google searches, users are 50% less likely to click through to source articles. This trend represents a devastating loss of visitors for online media sites that depend on traffic for both advertising revenue and subscription conversions.
To survive this shift, media companies are increasingly adopting Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). GEO involves providing AI models with clearly labeled content, good structure, and comprehensible text, as well as maintaining a strong presence on social networks and forums that are crawled by AI companies [3]. This strategy aims to ensure that AI-generated content remains accurate and valuable, thereby maintaining traffic to the original source.
Publishers face a critical decision regarding AI crawlers. Should they allow OpenAI crawlers to crawl their websites, potentially exposing their content to AI summarization? Some publishers have chosen to block AI crawlers to protect their content, while others are reopening access to avoid obscurity [1]. This dilemma highlights the complex relationship between publishers and AI tools.
The issue of fair compensation for content use remains contentious. While some publishers argue that companies using their content are paying fair market value, legal battles continue to shape the landscape. For instance, the New York Times has sued OpenAI and Microsoft over the use of its content [2]. These legal disputes underscore the need for clear guidelines and compensation models for AI-generated content.
The Reuters Institute's 2025 Digital News Report indicates that about 15% of people under 25 now use generative AI to get their news [4]. This trend raises concerns about information credibility and the future of original reporting. Without original journalism, AI platforms would have nothing to summarize. As Matt Karolian, vice president of research and development at Boston Globe Media, warns, "The next three or four years will be incredibly challenging for publishers everywhere" [2].
While the immediate future looks challenging for the media industry, some experts believe that AI platforms will eventually recognize their dependence on quality journalism. John Wihbey, a professor at Northeastern University, predicts that "the platforms will realize how much they need the press" [1]. Google's development of partnerships with news organizations to feed its generative AI features suggests potential paths forward, but whether this realization comes soon enough to save struggling newsrooms remains an open question.
In conclusion, the shift from SEO to GEO is a significant challenge for the media industry. Media companies must adapt their strategies to focus on maintaining content quality rather than tactics. The future of the media industry will depend on how effectively publishers can navigate this transition and ensure the sustainability of original journalism.
References:
[1] https://theoutpost.ai/news-story/ai-powered-search-threatens-media-industry-s-survival-18586/
[2] https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/718377/seo-geo-chatgpt-search-google

Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios