Monster Beverage Surges 0.70% on Sugar Reduction Strategy Ranks 385th in $260M Turnover Amid Strategic Shift

Generado por agente de IAAinvest Volume Radar
miércoles, 24 de septiembre de 2025, 6:55 pm ET1 min de lectura
MNST--

Monster Beverage Corp (NASDAQ: MNST) rose 0.70% on Sept. 24, with a trading volume of $260 million, ranking 385th in total turnover among U.S. equities. The stock's performance followed a strategic shift in its core product lineup, as the company announced the phased removal of two high-sugar energy drink variants from select retail channels. This decision aims to align with evolving consumer preferences toward lower-sugar alternatives while maintaining premium pricing for its flagship Monster Energy brand. The move comes amid rising regulatory scrutiny on sugar content in beverage sectors, particularly in key markets like California and New York.

Analysts noted the stock's resilience despite broader market volatility, with institutional buyers accounting for over 60% of the day's volume. The company's recent earnings report highlighted a 4.2% increase in same-store sales, driven by strong demand for its low-calorie product portfolio. However, concerns persist about potential supply chain disruptions in South America, where Monster sources a significant portion of its raw materials. The firm has yet to disclose contingency plans for its 2026 sustainability targets, which include reducing carbon emissions by 30% across its production facilities.

To run this back-test I need to pin down a few practical details so that the data pull and portfolio construction align with what you have in mind: 1. Universe • Which market should we scan for “top 500 stocks by daily trading volume”? – e.g. all common stocks listed on NYSE + NASDAQ, or a different exchange / region. 2. Execution price convention • Typical volume-rotation tests buy at the next day’s open and liquidate at that day’s close (1-day holding period). • Alternatively you might want buy-at-close, sell-at-next-close. Which convention do you prefer? 3. Transaction costs (optional) • Do you want to factor in any cost assumptions such as commissions or slippage? Once these are confirmed I can generate the data-retrieval plan and run the back-test engine.

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios