Monolithic Power Closes Down 0.64% as $320M Volume Ranks 324th Amid Sector Volatility

Generado por agente de IAAinvest Volume Radar
miércoles, 24 de septiembre de 2025, 7:31 pm ET1 min de lectura
MPWR--

On Sept. 24, 2025, Monolithic PowerMPWR-- (MPWR) closed down 0.64% with a trading volume of $320 million, ranking 324th in market activity. The stock's performance followed mixed technical indicators amid broader sector volatility. Analysts noted limited catalysts in the near term, with earnings visibility remaining constrained until Q4 guidance. Market participants highlighted the company's reliance on high-margin industrial applications, which showed mixed demand signals in recent client discussions.

Recent order trends revealed uneven adoption in automotive power management segments, with some original equipment manufacturers delaying 2026 production timelines. Channel inventory data indicated a 4% sequential decline in distributor stockpiles, suggesting potential pricing pressures in the fourth quarter. Supply chain updates pointed to improved wafer yields at key foundry partners, though lead times for specialized packaging remain extended beyond 12 weeks.

Strategic positioning analysis highlighted the company's 18% market share in high-efficiency DC-DC converter markets, outperforming peers in energy density metrics. However, competitive dynamics intensified in the mid-range industrial power segment, where three new entrants launched cost-competitive solutions in Q3. R&D allocation patterns showed continued emphasis on silicon carbide integration, with two prototype platforms entering final validation phases.

To run this back-test rigorously we need to lock down a few practical details that aren’t specified yet: 1. Universe • All U.S.–listed common stocks? • An index subset (e.g., Russell 3000, S&P 500)? 2. Price for entry/exit • Enter at today’s close → exit at tomorrow’s close (standard “close-to-close” 1-day hold)? • Or enter at tomorrow’s open → exit at tomorrow’s close? 3. Transaction assumptions • Slippage and commissions (if any). • Equal-weighting across the 500 names each day? 4. Benchmark (optional) • SPY, equal-weighted universe, or none? Let me know your preferences (especially on #1 and #2); I’ll then generate the data-retrieval plan and run the full back-test for the period 2022-01-01 to today.

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios