Volatilidad del mercado y incertidumbre en las políticas: Cómo enfrentar el panorama previo al juicio.

The U.S. economy stands at a crossroads as investors brace for two pivotal developments in early 2026: the Federal Reserve's response to a subdued labor market and the Supreme Court's ruling on the legality of President Trump's emergency tariffs. These events, occurring against a backdrop of slowing job growth and deepening policy uncertainty, are poised to shape market dynamics in the coming months. Strategic positioning requires a nuanced understanding of how these forces interact-and how they might be navigated.

A Fragile Labor Market and the Fed's Dilemma

The December 2025 payroll report underscored the fragility of the U.S. labor market. Total nonfarm employment rose by just 50,000 jobs, with gains concentrated in leisure and hospitality (27,000) and healthcare (21,000), while retail trade shed 25,000 positions according to the report. Annual job growth averaged 49,000 per month in 2025, a stark decline from the 168,000 average in 2024. Revisions to prior months' data-October's job loss adjusted to 173,000 and November's to 56,000- further highlight the uneven recovery.

The Federal Reserve's December 2025 FOMC statement acknowledged the "slowdown in job gains" and maintained a cautious stance, balancing support for employment with inflation control. Yet wage growth complicates this calculus: average hourly earnings rose 3.8% year-over-year, outpacing the Fed's 2% inflation target. This divergence between weak job creation and robust wage growth suggests a labor market that is neither overheating nor collapsing-a scenario that could lead to a prolonged period of policy ambiguity.

Tariff Uncertainty and Market Volatility

The Supreme Court's impending decision on Trump's use of emergency tariff powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) adds another layer of uncertainty. If the Court rules the tariffs illegal, the government may be forced to refund billions in collected duties, initially benefiting import-reliant sectors like retail and consumer goods. However, administrative hurdles in processing refunds could delay these gains, while the Trump administration retains the option to reimpose tariffs via alternative legal avenues, limiting long-term relief.

Conversely, upholding the tariffs would perpetuate elevated costs for businesses reliant on imported materials, particularly in aviation and aerospace, where tariffs on steel and aluminum indirectly raise production costs. Analysts estimate that Trump-era tariffs have already reduced after-tax incomes by 0.3% (Section 232) and 0.9% (IEEPA), compounding broader economic drag from reduced investment and productivity. The interplay between these tariffs and the labor market is evident: December's payroll data showed a modest 50,000 job increase, with the unemployment rate at 4.4%, but deteriorating consumer expectations for job security.

Strategic Positioning for a Dual-Headed Risk

Investors must navigate these dual risks by hedging against volatility while capitalizing on sector-specific opportunities. Sectors poised to benefit from tariff relief-such as retail and consumer discretionary- could see near-term gains if the Supreme Court invalidates the tariffs. However, these gains may be short-lived if the administration reasserts trade restrictions. Conversely, defensive sectors like healthcare and utilities, which added jobs in December, may offer stability amid uncertainty.

Bond markets, meanwhile, face upward pressure from potential Treasury issuance to offset lost tariff revenue, which could elevate yields and weigh on equities. Small-cap stocks, which have attracted investors anticipating liquidity-driven growth, remain a double-edged sword: they could outperform if the Fed adopts a dovish stance but are vulnerable to a sharp tightening cycle.

Conclusion: Preparing for a Range of Outcomes

The coming months will test the resilience of both policymakers and investors. A weak labor market may compel the Fed to cut rates, but persistent wage growth could delay action. Similarly, the Supreme Court's tariff ruling could either stabilize trade policy or deepen uncertainty. Strategic positioning demands flexibility: a diversified portfolio with exposure to tariff-sensitive sectors, a hedge against rising bond yields, and a readiness to pivot as policy clarity emerges. In this pre-judgment day landscape, adaptability is the key to navigating volatility.