Market Overview for Dogecoin/Yen (DOGEJPY) as of 2025-09-26
• DOGEJPY drifted lower after an initial rebound, closing below the 12:00 ET-1 open with a bearish bias.
• Volatility expanded early, but price settled in a tightening range as the session progressed.
• RSI signaled oversold levels late, but momentum failed to confirm a strong reversal.
• Bollinger Bands showed a mid-session contraction, suggesting potential for a breakout or breakdown.
• Volume surged during key selloffs but declined during consolidation, indicating reduced conviction in recent trends.
Dogecoin/Yen (DOGEJPY) opened at 34.66, reached a high of 34.78, and hit a low of 33.19 before closing at 33.71 at 12:00 ET on 2025-09-26. The total volume for the 24-hour period was 5,056,706 DOGEDOGE--, and the notional turnover amounted to 170,923,614 JPY. The session saw early volatility followed by a consolidation phase and a final selloff into the close.
Structure & Formations
Price action showed a bearish shift from a midday high of 34.78 with a decisive drop into the 33.19 level, which acted as immediate support. A notable candlestick pattern emerged during the 21:45–22:00 ET timeframe: a bearish engulfing pattern confirmed the downward bias. Later, the price tested the 33.6–33.8 range multiple times, forming a potential short-term support zone. A long lower wick on the 06:45 ET candle suggested rejection of a bearish move, but the failure to follow through signaled weak conviction.
Moving Averages
On the 15-minute chart, the 20-period SMA crossed below the 50-period SMA, indicating a short-term bearish crossover. The 50-period SMA remained above the 100- and 200-period SMAs, reflecting a more neutral stance on the daily chart. The price closed below all three longer-term moving averages, suggesting a potential continuation of the downtrend.
MACD & RSI
The MACD line remained below zero for most of the session, with a bearish crossover confirming the downward bias. However, a small positive divergence in the final 2 hours suggested a possible short-term bounce. The RSI dipped below 30 late in the session, entering oversold territory, but failed to produce a strong reversal move, indicating that sellers remained in control. Momentum appears to be waning, but a rebound remains a possibility.
Bollinger Bands
Bollinger Bands displayed a contraction from 04:00 to 06:00 ET, followed by a sharp expansion as price dropped to the lower band. The price settled near the lower band at the 12:00 ET close, indicating continued bearish pressure. Volatility has increased significantly over the past 12 hours, and if the price breaks the lower band with volume, further downside could be expected.
Volume & Turnover
Volume spiked during the early afternoon and late night sessions, confirming the selloff into the 33.19 level. However, volume dried up after 08:00 ET, coinciding with the consolidation phase, which reduced the likelihood of a strong follow-through. Notional turnover mirrored volume, with the largest spike occurring during the 17:30–18:00 ET timeframe as the price broke lower. Price and turnover are currently aligned, suggesting a coherent bearish move.
Fibonacci Retracements
Applying Fibonacci retracements to the recent 15-minute swing (34.78 high to 33.19 low), the 38.2% level at 34.10 and 61.8% level at 33.66 were tested multiple times. The price briefly bounced off the 61.8% level before resuming the downward trend, indicating limited short-term buying interest. On the daily chart, the 38.2% level at 34.10 remains a key area to watch for potential reversals.
Backtest Hypothesis
A potential backtest strategy could involve using the 50-period and 20-period SMAs as entry triggers, with entries initiated when the 20 SMA crosses below the 50 SMA on the 15-minute chart. Stop-losses could be placed just above the nearest resistance level or the upper Bollinger Band, with targets aligned with Fibonacci retracement levels. A trailing stop could be introduced to capture any short-term rebounds. Given the current setup, this strategy may be biased toward short positions with tight risk management.



Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios