Lucid Gains 3.33% as Trading Volume Plummets 37.54% to 481st U.S. Rank
Lucid Group (LCID) rose 3.33% on Sept. 24, with a trading volume of $0.20 billion, marking a 37.54% decline from the previous day’s activity. The stock ranked 481st in trading volume among U.S. equities, reflecting mixed investor sentiment amid evolving market dynamics.
Recent developments highlight strategic shifts within Lucid’s operations. The company announced a restructuring plan to streamline production costs, focusing on optimizing its battery supply chain through partnerships with regional suppliers. This move aims to reduce capital expenditures and accelerate delivery timelines for its luxury EV models. Analysts noted the potential for improved margins, though execution risks remain a concern.
Lucid also disclosed progress in its retail expansion strategy, with plans to open 15 new dealerships in key metropolitan areas by year-end. The initiative underscores its push to compete with established EV leaders by enhancing customer accessibility. However, the success of this rollout hinges on maintaining profitability per location amid rising operational costs.
To run this back-test accurately, I need to pin down a few practical details about how the strategy should be implemented: 1. Universe — Should we look at all actively-traded U.S. common stocks (NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX), or a different universe? 2. Ranking metric — “Daily trading volume” — do you want to rank by shares traded, or by dollar volume (shares × close price)? 3. Portfolio construction — Once the top-500 names are identified each day, should we allocate equal weight to every name for that day’s trade? 4. Trade timing — Typical intraday convention is either a) form the list after today’s close, buy at tomorrow’s open, sell at tomorrow’s close, or b) form the list after today’s close, buy at tomorrow’s close, sell at the close the following day. Which timing do you prefer? 5. Frictions — Should we include an estimate of transaction costs / commissions, or assume frictionless trading? Let me know your preferences and I’ll set up the back-test accordingly.


Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios