Liberty Global-B shares surge 89.69% intraday after pre-market 232.5% gain on $40 price rise and $8.53M turnover.

think> Okay, let's tackle this query step by step. The user wants me to act as a financial analyst explaining a stock price movement linked to relevant news. First, the stock in question is Liberty Global B, which had an intraday up movement of 89.69243558%. Rounded to two decimal places, that's 89.69%. The trading period is intraday, so during regular market hours. Looking at the recent news provided: there's one event mentioned. The title says Liberty Global-B soared 232.5% in pre-market. Wait, the summary mentions a 232.5% increase to $40 with a turnover of $8.53 million. But the user's input says the stock performance was an intraday up of 89.69%. Hmm, there's a discrepancy here. The news event is about a pre-market surge, but the stock's performance is reported during intraday. So the first thing to check is whether the news event is relevant to the trading session mentioned. The news event is pre-market, while the stock's movement is during intraday. The user's instruction is to evaluate if the news events are relevant to the stock and the movement. The news event is about a significant gain in pre-market trading, but the user's input is about the intraday movement. So does the pre-market news affect the intraday price? Typically, pre-market activity can influence the opening price and subsequent intraday trading. However, the percentage gains here are different: 232.5% in pre-market vs. 89.69% intraday. That's a big difference. The user's instruction says to determine if the movement was driven by specific events. The news event is about the stock soaring in pre-market, but the actual performance given is during intraday. The summary mentions the pre-market gain, but the user's input is about the intraday up. Wait, maybe there's confusion here. The user provided the stock's intraday movement, but the news event is about a pre-market surge. The question is whether the pre-market news caused the intraday movement. However, the intraday movement is a 89.69% increase, which is less than the pre-market's 232.5%. That suggests that the stock might have continued to rise during the intraday session, possibly due to the same news. But the problem is that the user's input states the stock's performance as intraday up 89.69%, while the news event is about a pre-market surge. The user wants to link the two. However, the instructions require that the news event is relevant to the stock's movement in the specified trading period. Since the news is about pre-market and the movement is intraday, the analyst needs to assess if the pre-market event caused the intraday movement. In that case, the pre-market surge (232.5%) might have driven the intraday increase (89.69%), even though the percentage is lower. The intraday movement could be part of the continuation of the pre-market momentum. So, the news event is relevant. The movement is upward, and the news is bullish. The percentages differ because the pre-market movement is a larger jump, but the intraday movement is a continuation. The example provided in the user's instructions shows that when the news is pre-market, and the stock movement is also pre-market, the explanation links them. Here, the movement is intraday, but the news is pre-market. The analyst needs to connect the two, explaining that the pre-market surge led to the intraday increase. Therefore, the key point is that the pre-market news event (the 232.5% surge) is the reason for the intraday movement. The user's instruction allows for the trading session to be specified, and the news event is about a different session but is relevant. So, the correct approach is to state that Liberty Global B's intraday surge of 89.69% was driven by the pre-market news of a 232.5% gain. The summary should mention the pre-market surge as the cause. Now, checking the formatting rules: round the percentage to two decimals (89.69%), remove trailing zeros. Use correct punctuation and natural English. The output should be a concise paragraph, professional and factual, similar to Bloomberg. Putting it all together: Liberty Global B surged 89.69% intraday after soaring 232.5% in pre-market trading. The pre-market gain, driven by a significant volume of $8.53 million, indicates strong investor interest. The movement aligns with the news event, which is the primary cause. Need to ensure that the word count is under 150 and that the key points are included.