Knorex shares surge 10.67% intraday following appointment of Michael Sun as CFO to strengthen financial leadership for growth.

think> Okay, let me start by looking at the user's query. They provided a stock's performance data and several news events related to Knorex. The task is to determine if the stock's movement was driven by any of the news events and summarize it in a specific format. First, I need to check the stock movement. The input says Knorex's stock went up 10.67% intraday. The trading period is intraday, so it's during regular trading hours. Now, looking at the news events. There are six reasons listed. The first one mentions that the stock fell 2% after the appointment of a new CFO. Wait, but the current movement is a 10.67% increase. The other news events (2-6) all talk about the appointment of Michael Sun as CFO. The first news event seems to be a different time, maybe a previous appointment? The date on the first news is January 23, 2026, but the stock movement here is also in the same time frame. Wait, the first news is from January 23, 2026, and mentions the stock fell 2% after the appointment. But the current stock movement is a 10.67% increase intraday. That seems conflicting. Wait, the user input says the recent news events include Reason 1, which is from Investing.com, where the stock fell 2% after the appointment. But the other reasons (2-6) are all about the same appointment of Michael Sun. The date in the first news is January 23, 2026, and the appointment is effective January 22, 2026. So the stock fell 2% on Friday after the appointment announcement. However, the current stock movement is a 10.67% increase during intraday trading. That suggests that maybe the stock rebounded later, but the user is asking about the current movement. Wait, the user's input is in Chinese, and the stock performance is listed as "Knorex盘中 intradayup10.67193676%". The translation is that during intraday trading, the stock went up by 10.67%. The recent news events include the appointment of Michael Sun as CFO. But the first news event mentions a 2% drop after the appointment. However, the other news events (2-6) are all about the same appointment. So there's a contradiction here. Wait, maybe the first news event is a different appointment. Let me check the names. Reason 1 says "Ning...", but the others refer to Michael Sun. The first news event's content is cut off, but the title mentions the appointment of a new CFO. The second reason and others are about Michael Sun. So perhaps there were two different CFO appointments? But the dates are the same. The appointment of Michael Sun is effective January 22, 2026, and the news is from January 23, 2026. The first news event (Reason 1) is also from January 23, 2026, and mentions the stock fell 2% after the appointment. However, the current stock movement is a 10.67% increase. That suggests that the stock may have had a negative reaction initially (2% down) but then a positive reaction later (10.67% up). But the user is asking about the current movement, which is the 10.67% increase. Wait, but the user provided multiple news events, some of which are conflicting. The first news is bearish (stock fell 2%), and the others are about the same appointment. The user's instruction is to evaluate whether each news event is relevant and if they align with the stock's movement. In this case, the key is to see which news events are relevant to the current movement. The current movement is an intraday up 10.67%, so the relevant news would be the appointment of Michael Sun. However, the first news event mentions a different appointment (Ning) causing a 2% drop. But in the other news events (Reasons 2-6), the appointment is of Michael Sun. So perhaps there was confusion in the first news event, or maybe a typo. Wait, the first news event's title says "Knorex stock falls after appointment of new CFO" and the summary says the stock fell 2% after the AI-driven programmatic advertising company announced the appointment of Ning... but the content is cut off. The other news events all mention the appointment of Michael Sun. So perhaps there was a mix-up in the names. Maybe the first news event is about the same appointment but with the wrong name? Or perhaps it's a different appointment. Assuming that the user provided.