JD Vance Defends Trump's Iran Bombing, Claims "Dumb Presidents" Caused Middle East Entanglements
PorAinvest
lunes, 23 de junio de 2025, 12:10 pm ET1 min de lectura
ETY--
Vance argued that Iran's refusal to negotiate in good faith prompted the strikes. He stated, "Diplomacy was never given a real chance by the Iranians." He also emphasized that the new military engagement will not be long and that the Trump administration is committed to negotiations with Iran [2].
However, Vance's comments have sparked controversy. Critics argue that the strikes may escalate tensions in the region and could lead to further military action. There are also concerns about the ongoing foreign influence at the highest levels of the U.S. government [1].
Vance's defense of the strikes comes amid growing tensions between the U.S. and Iran. Last week, Iran's parliament approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime chokepoint through which nearly 20% of the world's oil supply flows. The move was seen as a response to the U.S. airstrikes [3].
The Trump administration has long been critical of Iran's nuclear program and has imposed economic sanctions on the country. Trump's strategy toward Iran has rested on three key pillars: withdrawing from the nuclear deal, reimposing crippling economic sanctions, and applying military pressure with explicit threats of force [3].
The strikes have raised concerns about the potential impact on global energy markets. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical route for oil tankers, and any disruption could lead to significant price increases and supply disruptions.
References:
[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jd-vance/iran-vance-intervention-skeptic-role-salesman-rcna214345
[2] https://www.cnbctv18.com/world/us-vice-president-jd-vance-secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-react-to-strikes-on-iran-say-at-war-with-its-nuclear-program-19624967.htm/amp
[3] https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-850952
JD--
Vice President JD Vance defended President Trump's bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, saying Americans shouldn't worry because Trump isn't "dumb." Vance claimed the new US military engagement won't be long and that the Trump administration wants negotiations with Iran, despite Tehran's refusal to negotiate under direct military threat. Vance's comments sparked controversy and raised concerns about ongoing foreign influence at the highest levels of the US government.
Vice President JD Vance has defended President Donald Trump's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities, asserting that the action was necessary to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Speaking on NBC News' "Meet the Press" and ABC's "This Week," Vance emphasized that the United States is not at war with Iran but is targeting its nuclear program. He claimed that the strikes, which hit three major facilities—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—have significantly set back Iran's nuclear capabilities [2].Vance argued that Iran's refusal to negotiate in good faith prompted the strikes. He stated, "Diplomacy was never given a real chance by the Iranians." He also emphasized that the new military engagement will not be long and that the Trump administration is committed to negotiations with Iran [2].
However, Vance's comments have sparked controversy. Critics argue that the strikes may escalate tensions in the region and could lead to further military action. There are also concerns about the ongoing foreign influence at the highest levels of the U.S. government [1].
Vance's defense of the strikes comes amid growing tensions between the U.S. and Iran. Last week, Iran's parliament approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime chokepoint through which nearly 20% of the world's oil supply flows. The move was seen as a response to the U.S. airstrikes [3].
The Trump administration has long been critical of Iran's nuclear program and has imposed economic sanctions on the country. Trump's strategy toward Iran has rested on three key pillars: withdrawing from the nuclear deal, reimposing crippling economic sanctions, and applying military pressure with explicit threats of force [3].
The strikes have raised concerns about the potential impact on global energy markets. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical route for oil tankers, and any disruption could lead to significant price increases and supply disruptions.
References:
[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jd-vance/iran-vance-intervention-skeptic-role-salesman-rcna214345
[2] https://www.cnbctv18.com/world/us-vice-president-jd-vance-secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-react-to-strikes-on-iran-say-at-war-with-its-nuclear-program-19624967.htm/amp
[3] https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-850952

Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios